Keywords
decency
memory
deception
Ishiguro
Never Let Me Go
How to Cite
Abstract
Set in a parallel dystopian universe, Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go chronicles the lives of three clones created to “donate” their vital organs to aid and abet scientific advancement. No doubt due to our own contemporary anxieties, critics have largely focused on the novel’s dark bio-ethical themes. Yet Ishiguro maintained Never Let Me Go was his most hopeful novel, demonstrating people could lead decent lives despite otherwise hopeless circumstances. Our reading of Ishiguro’s novel seeks a third way between author and critic. On the one hand, we explore Ishiguro’s understanding of decency, taking seriously the sense of hope he finds in modern society. Yet on the other hand, we partly join the critical commentary by casting doubt on the viability of this decency, and therefore on the hope he sees for our future. In other words, we suggest Ishiguro may have in fact written darker than he knew.
Similar Articles
- Richard Avramenko, Editor’s Note , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Lorraine Pangle, Plato's Political Epistemology , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Joseph M Knippenberg, Liberalism and Religion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- James W Skillen, Philosophy of the Cosmonimic Idea , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Linda C Raeder, Voegelin on Gnosticism, Modernity, and the Balance of Consciousness , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 36 (2007): A Symposium on Leo Strauss and His Students
- Leah Bradshaw, Hannah Arendt: The German Years , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Jeff Polet, Returning to Localism as a Return to the Self , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Richard Boyd, David Golemboski, Gambling on the Lives of Corporations , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 1 (2021): Symposium: Music in Plato's Political Thought
- Jeff Polet, Foolish Hearts , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Lee Trepanier, Introduction to Symposium , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Ron Srigley, Monserrat, Torres, and Planinc on Voegelin’s Return to the Ancients , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- David B Frisk, Gottfried’s Disconnect , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Nicholas Higgins, Why Can’t We Be Friends? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Seth Benardete, Leo Strauss’ The City and Man , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 8 (1978): Reviews
- Onur Ulas Ince, Burke A. Hendrix, Lida Maxwell, Ross Carroll, Brandon Turner, Daniel I. O’Neill, Author Meets Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Jeff Polet, Returning to Localism as a Return to the Self , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Nathan Schlueter, Five More Questions for Antiliberal Conservatives , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Onur Ulas Ince, Political Economy and Edmund Burke’s (Il)Liberal Logic of Empire , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Russell Nieli, Critic of the Sensate Culture , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>