Keywords
decency
memory
deception
Ishiguro
Never Let Me Go
How to Cite
Abstract
Set in a parallel dystopian universe, Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go chronicles the lives of three clones created to “donate” their vital organs to aid and abet scientific advancement. No doubt due to our own contemporary anxieties, critics have largely focused on the novel’s dark bio-ethical themes. Yet Ishiguro maintained Never Let Me Go was his most hopeful novel, demonstrating people could lead decent lives despite otherwise hopeless circumstances. Our reading of Ishiguro’s novel seeks a third way between author and critic. On the one hand, we explore Ishiguro’s understanding of decency, taking seriously the sense of hope he finds in modern society. Yet on the other hand, we partly join the critical commentary by casting doubt on the viability of this decency, and therefore on the hope he sees for our future. In other words, we suggest Ishiguro may have in fact written darker than he knew.
Similar Articles
- Richard Avramenko, Editor’s Note , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Lorraine Pangle, Plato's Political Epistemology , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Joseph M Knippenberg, Liberalism and Religion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- James W Skillen, Philosophy of the Cosmonimic Idea , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Linda C Raeder, Voegelin on Gnosticism, Modernity, and the Balance of Consciousness , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 36 (2007): A Symposium on Leo Strauss and His Students
- Leah Bradshaw, Hannah Arendt: The German Years , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Jeff Polet, Returning to Localism as a Return to the Self , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Richard Boyd, David Golemboski, Gambling on the Lives of Corporations , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 1 (2021): Symposium: Music in Plato's Political Thought
- Jeff Polet, Foolish Hearts , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth B McIntyre, Conservative Practice versus Conservative “Values” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Frederick D Wilhelmsen, The Political Philosophy of Alvaro d’Ors , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 20 (1991): Reviews
- Ethan Alexander-Davey, Paul Gottfried, David Conway, Michael Harding, Yoram Hazony, Symposium on Yoram Hazony's The Virtue of Nationalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Eugene F Miller, David Easton’s Political Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 1 (1971): Reviews
- Lee Trepanier, What Can Political Science Learn from Literature? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Bernat Torres Morales, Josep Monserrat Molas, The Significance of Plato’s Philebus in the Philosophy of Eric Voegelin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Leah Bradshaw, Hannah Arendt: The German Years , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, For the Love of the Bourgeois , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger During the War , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Judith Stewart Shank, Form and Restraint in John Crowe Ransom’s Vision of Community , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>