Keywords
decency
memory
deception
Ishiguro
Never Let Me Go
How to Cite
Abstract
Set in a parallel dystopian universe, Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go chronicles the lives of three clones created to “donate” their vital organs to aid and abet scientific advancement. No doubt due to our own contemporary anxieties, critics have largely focused on the novel’s dark bio-ethical themes. Yet Ishiguro maintained Never Let Me Go was his most hopeful novel, demonstrating people could lead decent lives despite otherwise hopeless circumstances. Our reading of Ishiguro’s novel seeks a third way between author and critic. On the one hand, we explore Ishiguro’s understanding of decency, taking seriously the sense of hope he finds in modern society. Yet on the other hand, we partly join the critical commentary by casting doubt on the viability of this decency, and therefore on the hope he sees for our future. In other words, we suggest Ishiguro may have in fact written darker than he knew.
Similar Articles
- Richard Avramenko, Editor’s Note , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Lorraine Pangle, Plato's Political Epistemology , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Joseph M Knippenberg, Liberalism and Religion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- James W Skillen, Philosophy of the Cosmonimic Idea , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Linda C Raeder, Voegelin on Gnosticism, Modernity, and the Balance of Consciousness , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 36 (2007): A Symposium on Leo Strauss and His Students
- Leah Bradshaw, Hannah Arendt: The German Years , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Jeff Polet, Returning to Localism as a Return to the Self , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Richard Boyd, David Golemboski, Gambling on the Lives of Corporations , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 1 (2021): Symposium: Music in Plato's Political Thought
- Jeff Polet, Foolish Hearts , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Bruce P Frohnen, Redeeming America’s Political Culture , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Gary Bryner, Richard Vetterli, Hugo Grotius and Natural Law , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 22 (1993): Essays
- Paul Gottfried, Thoughts on Our Protestant Legacy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 39 (2010): Symposia on American Constitutionalism and on Religion & Politics
- Richard L Velkley, Masks of Mastery , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Steve McGuire, David J. Walsh, Barry Cooper, Thierry Gontier, John von Heyking, John von Heyking, The Form of Politics: Aristotle and Plato on Friendship , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Zachary K. German, What Prudence is Allowed to Produce , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- James Zink, The Independence of the Declaration and Constitution , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Luke Foster, The Duty of the Clercs to the Nation , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Gary J Schmitt, Washington’s Proclamation of Neutrality , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Stephen A McKnight, Gnosticism and Modernity , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 34 (2005): Eric Voegelin’s <em>New Science of Politics</em>: A 50th Anniversary Symposium