Keywords
Frankenstein
Dante
How to Cite
Abstract
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a philosophic novel and a valuable resource for political theorists. A range of readings highlight Shelley’s Romantic concerns with science; others foreground Enlightenment concerns with rights. In this essay, though, I uncover ethical concerns of an earlier epoque in Frankenstein. I show how Shelley’s depiction of Victor’s frozen fate consciously mirrors Dante’s sinners in the frozen Hell of Inferno, indicating how Victor’s fate stems from his betrayal of his family. I argue that Frankenstein offers a more Classical message: caring for our own souls by acting well towards those closest to us provides ethical mooring. This message is particularly pertinent in a time when political scientists emphasize structural problems and solutions in both their research and teaching, solutions which often seem to render individual action meaningless independent of a systematic movement.
Similar Articles
- Lee Trepanier, What Can Political Science Learn from Literature? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Lee Trepanier, Eric Voegelin and Political Economy: An Introduction , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Glenn Hughes, Paul Kidder, James Greenaway, Thomas McPartland, Henrik Syse, Author Meets Critics: From Dickinson to Dylan: Visions of Transcendence in Modernist Literature , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Eileen Hunt, Amy Atchison, Duncan Bell, Christopher Brooke, David Gunkel, Robin Hammerman, Helen McCabe, Shauna Shames, Author Meets Critics: Artificial Life After Frankenstein , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Lee Trepanier, Camus, Nietzsche, and the Cartesian Subject: Political Community in Postmodernity , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Barry Cooper, Glenn Hughes, S.F. McGuire, Carol Cooper, Tilo Schabert, Author Meets Critics: Tilo Schabert's The Figure of Modernity: On the Irregularity of an Epoch , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Michael P Zuckert, The Recent Literature on Locke’s Political Philosophy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Dante Germino, Karl Popper’s Open Society , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 8 (1978): Reviews
- Dante Germino, Henri Bergson , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 9 (1979): Reviews
- Jack F Matlock, Literature and Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 9 (1979): Reviews
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany