Keywords
Frankenstein
Dante
How to Cite
Abstract
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a philosophic novel and a valuable resource for political theorists. A range of readings highlight Shelley’s Romantic concerns with science; others foreground Enlightenment concerns with rights. In this essay, though, I uncover ethical concerns of an earlier epoque in Frankenstein. I show how Shelley’s depiction of Victor’s frozen fate consciously mirrors Dante’s sinners in the frozen Hell of Inferno, indicating how Victor’s fate stems from his betrayal of his family. I argue that Frankenstein offers a more Classical message: caring for our own souls by acting well towards those closest to us provides ethical mooring. This message is particularly pertinent in a time when political scientists emphasize structural problems and solutions in both their research and teaching, solutions which often seem to render individual action meaningless independent of a systematic movement.
Similar Articles
- Lee Trepanier, What Can Political Science Learn from Literature? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Lee Trepanier, Eric Voegelin and Political Economy: An Introduction , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Glenn Hughes, Paul Kidder, James Greenaway, Thomas McPartland, Henrik Syse, Author Meets Critics: From Dickinson to Dylan: Visions of Transcendence in Modernist Literature , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Eileen Hunt, Amy Atchison, Duncan Bell, Christopher Brooke, David Gunkel, Robin Hammerman, Helen McCabe, Shauna Shames, Author Meets Critics: Artificial Life After Frankenstein , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Lee Trepanier, Camus, Nietzsche, and the Cartesian Subject: Political Community in Postmodernity , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Barry Cooper, Glenn Hughes, S.F. McGuire, Carol Cooper, Tilo Schabert, Author Meets Critics: Tilo Schabert's The Figure of Modernity: On the Irregularity of an Epoch , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Michael P Zuckert, The Recent Literature on Locke’s Political Philosophy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Dante Germino, Karl Popper’s Open Society , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 8 (1978): Reviews
- Dante Germino, Henri Bergson , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 9 (1979): Reviews
- Jack F Matlock, Literature and Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 9 (1979): Reviews
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Paul Gottfried, Response to Contributors , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Lida Maxwell, Burke, Cultural Difference, and the Problem of Imperial Critique , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Victor Ferkiss, Daniel Bell’s Concept of Post-Industrial Society , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 9 (1979): Reviews
- Samuel Garrett Zeitlin, Francis Bacon on Just Warfare , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 1 (2021): Symposium: Music in Plato's Political Thought
- S. Adam Seagrave, John Adams the Locke-Smith? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Andrew Sabl, Introduction to Forum on Luke Mayville, John Adams and the Fear of American Oligarchy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Ashleen Menchaca-Bagnulo, Predatory Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Burke A. Hendrix, Edmund Burke, Native Americans, and the Burkean Imagination , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Daniel I. O’Neill, Reply to Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Michelle Schwarze, Freedom and Dependence in John Adams and the Fear of American Oligarchy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany