Keywords
Laws
Leo Strauss
Political Philosophy
Hermeneutics
How to Cite
Abstract
The movement of thought in Leo Strauss's Argument and the Action of Plato’s Laws allows one basic motif of the engagement with Plato to be rendered visible: the significance of the human body as presupposition and condition of politics and lawgiving. In the present treatment the political significance of the body in Strauss’s engagement with Plato allows the significance of embodiment to emerge clearly. Strauss's hermeneutic approach to the Laws is developed (in section 2). The options of “philosophic politics” that Strauss plays out with the example of Plato’s Laws is developed in section 3. Finally, from this point the question of power is developed. Namely, with the question of power, the problem is pushed to the level of the relation between law and reason. What possibilities are there for philosophic politics to decide the question of power for itself?
Similar Articles
- John Boersma, Leo Strauss on the Machiavellian Moment(s) in Aristotle , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Grant Havers, Does Politics Need a Theology? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Michael Davis, Seth Benardete’s Second Sailing , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Gordon Lloyd, Steven P Ealy, The Eric Voegelin-Willmoore Kendall Correspondence , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 33 (2004): Essays
- Grant Havers, Voegelin, Marx, and the "Evils" of Capitalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Emmanuel Patard, Supplement and Corrections to “The Strauss-Voegelin Correspondence” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 39 (2010): Symposia on American Constitutionalism and on Religion & Politics
- Raph C Hancock, What Was Political Philosophy? Or , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 36 (2007): A Symposium on Leo Strauss and His Students
- Dustin Sebell, An Achilles Without a Zeus , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Gerald Mara, Re-Reading Plato's Timaeus-Critias Politically , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Lee Trepanier, Introduction to Symposium , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Ron Srigley, Monserrat, Torres, and Planinc on Voegelin’s Return to the Ancients , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- David B Frisk, Gottfried’s Disconnect , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Nicholas Higgins, Why Can’t We Be Friends? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Seth Benardete, Leo Strauss’ The City and Man , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 8 (1978): Reviews
- Onur Ulas Ince, Burke A. Hendrix, Lida Maxwell, Ross Carroll, Brandon Turner, Daniel I. O’Neill, Author Meets Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Jeff Polet, Returning to Localism as a Return to the Self , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Nathan Schlueter, Five More Questions for Antiliberal Conservatives , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Onur Ulas Ince, Political Economy and Edmund Burke’s (Il)Liberal Logic of Empire , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Russell Nieli, Critic of the Sensate Culture , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>