Keywords
Laws
Leo Strauss
Political Philosophy
Hermeneutics
How to Cite
Abstract
The movement of thought in Leo Strauss's Argument and the Action of Plato’s Laws allows one basic motif of the engagement with Plato to be rendered visible: the significance of the human body as presupposition and condition of politics and lawgiving. In the present treatment the political significance of the body in Strauss’s engagement with Plato allows the significance of embodiment to emerge clearly. Strauss's hermeneutic approach to the Laws is developed (in section 2). The options of “philosophic politics” that Strauss plays out with the example of Plato’s Laws is developed in section 3. Finally, from this point the question of power is developed. Namely, with the question of power, the problem is pushed to the level of the relation between law and reason. What possibilities are there for philosophic politics to decide the question of power for itself?
Similar Articles
- John Boersma, Leo Strauss on the Machiavellian Moment(s) in Aristotle , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Grant Havers, Does Politics Need a Theology? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Michael Davis, Seth Benardete’s Second Sailing , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Gordon Lloyd, Steven P Ealy, The Eric Voegelin-Willmoore Kendall Correspondence , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 33 (2004): Essays
- Grant Havers, Voegelin, Marx, and the "Evils" of Capitalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Emmanuel Patard, Supplement and Corrections to “The Strauss-Voegelin Correspondence” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 39 (2010): Symposia on American Constitutionalism and on Religion & Politics
- Raph C Hancock, What Was Political Philosophy? Or , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 36 (2007): A Symposium on Leo Strauss and His Students
- Dustin Sebell, An Achilles Without a Zeus , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Gerald Mara, Re-Reading Plato's Timaeus-Critias Politically , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Robert L Pfaltzgraff, Karl Deutsch and the Study of Political Science , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 2 (1972): Reviews
- Ann Diamond, The Anti-Federalist “Brutus” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 6 (1976): Reviews
- John J Schrems, A Reexamination of Harry V. Jaffa’s Thomism and Aristotelianism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 18 (1988): Reviews
- George W Carey, James McClellan (1937–2005) , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 34 (2005): Eric Voegelin’s <em>New Science of Politics</em>: A 50th Anniversary Symposium
- D J T Sullivan, From the Interstices of Authority , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 36 (2007): A Symposium on Leo Strauss and His Students
- Robert Thigpen, Michael Walzer’s Political Theory of the Common Life , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 14 (1984): Reviews
- Paul Gottfried, Confronting the Challenge of the Exception , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 20 (1991): Reviews
- Luke C. Sheahan, Timothy C. Shiell, Howard Schweber, Bruce P. Frohnen, Symposium on Luke Sheahan's Why Associations Matter: The Case for First Amendment Pluralism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Steven P Ealy, A Place for the Negro in the Agrarian Scheme , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Richard A Melanson, Revisionism Subdued? Robert James Maddox and the Origins of the Cold War , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 7 (1977): Reviews