Keywords
Rabelais
wit
Gargantua
Pantagruel
comedy
How to Cite
Abstract
In Playing the Fool, Ralph Lerner recovers a tradition of using humor to reflect on political life, either to subvert existing norms or to discuss their contradictions discretely. This article argues that François Rabelais belongs in the tradition of philosophers who played the fool. Rabelais's sharp satirical attacks on monasticism and scholasticism show how comedy can be used to effect political change. His farcical presentations of kingship point in a different direction, revealing how comedy can be used to articulate discrete reservations about existing institutions without aiming at their abolition. Studying the way Rabelais jests with the giant protagonists of his novels allows us to see the political significance of his laughter while suggesting the limitations of the comic perspective.
Similar Articles
- Ted V McAllister, What Does Burke Have to Do With America? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Peter I Minowitz, Machiavellianism Come of Age? Leo Strauss on Modernity and Economics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 22 (1993): Essays
- Charles E Butterworth, Robert H. Horwitz, 1923-1987 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Robert Horwitz, John Locke and The Preservation of Liberty , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 6 (1976): Reviews
- George J Graham, Thoughts on Ludwig Wittgenstein and Political Analysis , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Alan Abramowitz, Heinz Eulau, Recent Research on Congress in a Democratic Perspective , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 2 (1972): Reviews
- Daniel J. Mahoney, With Reason Attentive to Grace , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Samuel Piccolo, To Hell with Both of You , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Adam Tate, Wrestling with the Modern State , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 2 (2017): Symposium: The Life and Work of Christopher Dawson
- Dustin Sebell, An Achilles Without a Zeus , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany