Keywords
Rabelais
wit
Gargantua
Pantagruel
comedy
How to Cite
Abstract
In Playing the Fool, Ralph Lerner recovers a tradition of using humor to reflect on political life, either to subvert existing norms or to discuss their contradictions discretely. This article argues that François Rabelais belongs in the tradition of philosophers who played the fool. Rabelais's sharp satirical attacks on monasticism and scholasticism show how comedy can be used to effect political change. His farcical presentations of kingship point in a different direction, revealing how comedy can be used to articulate discrete reservations about existing institutions without aiming at their abolition. Studying the way Rabelais jests with the giant protagonists of his novels allows us to see the political significance of his laughter while suggesting the limitations of the comic perspective.
Similar Articles
- Erin A. Dolgoy, Kimberly Hurd Hale, Virtue and Vice , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Catherine Craig, Sara MacDonald, Wit’s Justice in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Zdravko Planinc, Aristophanic Themes in Plato’s Republic , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Travis D. Smith, Introduction to Wit in the History of Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Ted J. Richards, Macbeth's Demonic Right Monarchy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Geoffrey C. Kellow, Benjamin Franklin’s Comic Critique of Religious Controversy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Ryan McKinnell, Wit and Persuasion in Philosophic Courtiership , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Peter Busch, Democratizing Nietzsche , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 33 (2004): Essays
- Joseph Pappin, Edmund Burke’s Progeny , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- S. Adam Seagrave, John Adams the Locke-Smith? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Alexander J Groth, Michael Parenti and American Democracy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- Richard Avramenko, Notes on Contributors , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Richard Avramenko, Notes on Contributors , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Walter Berns, Free Speech and Free Government , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 2 (1972): Reviews
- Samuel T Francis, Power and History , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 12 (1982): Symposium: Political Parties and the Madisonian Model
- Michael Promisel, Why Character Matters , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Jerry Weinberger, But Which Gods Will Save Us? The Political Legacy of Nietzsche and Heidegger , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 16 (1986): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Nicholas Capaldi, John Stuart Mill’s Defense of Liberal Culture , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium
- David DesRosiers, “The Team Against the Committee” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Ronald M Peters, Political Theory, Political Science, and A Preface to Democratic Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 7 (1977): Reviews