Keywords
Rabelais
wit
Gargantua
Pantagruel
comedy
How to Cite
Abstract
In Playing the Fool, Ralph Lerner recovers a tradition of using humor to reflect on political life, either to subvert existing norms or to discuss their contradictions discretely. This article argues that François Rabelais belongs in the tradition of philosophers who played the fool. Rabelais's sharp satirical attacks on monasticism and scholasticism show how comedy can be used to effect political change. His farcical presentations of kingship point in a different direction, revealing how comedy can be used to articulate discrete reservations about existing institutions without aiming at their abolition. Studying the way Rabelais jests with the giant protagonists of his novels allows us to see the political significance of his laughter while suggesting the limitations of the comic perspective.
Similar Articles
- Erin A. Dolgoy, Kimberly Hurd Hale, Virtue and Vice , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Catherine Craig, Sara MacDonald, Wit’s Justice in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Zdravko Planinc, Aristophanic Themes in Plato’s Republic , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Travis D. Smith, Introduction to Wit in the History of Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Ted J. Richards, Macbeth's Demonic Right Monarchy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Geoffrey C. Kellow, Benjamin Franklin’s Comic Critique of Religious Controversy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Ryan McKinnell, Wit and Persuasion in Philosophic Courtiership , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Peter Busch, Democratizing Nietzsche , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 33 (2004): Essays
- Joseph Pappin, Edmund Burke’s Progeny , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- S. Adam Seagrave, John Adams the Locke-Smith? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Ian A T McLean, The Fuzzy Picture of Hitler’s Pope , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Thomas S Engeman, George C S Benson, Dewey, Freud, and American Morality , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- John C Koritansky, Response to Morton J. Frisch and to Martin Diamond , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 28 (1999): Martin Diamond’s Contribution to American Political Thought: A Symposium
- J Brian Benestad, Rev. Ernest Fortin, A.A., 1923–2002 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- George Anastaplo, Samplings , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 27 (1998): Eric Voegelin’s <em>The Ecumenic Age</em>: A Symposium
- Joel Andrew Johnson, A Discriminating Irreverence , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Dennis Hale, Arthur F. Bentley , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 13 (1983): Reviews
- Walter Nicgorski, Theory Redivivus , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 25 (1996): The State of Political Science: A Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Symposium
- Charldean Newell, Bureaucratic Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 9 (1979): Reviews
- Robert Orr, A Double Agent in the Dream of Michael Oakeshott , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott