Keywords
Anti-Liberalism
Conservatism
Liberal order
Technocracy
Biotechnology
Post-political
How to Cite
Abstract
Modern politics is characterized by the absolutization of political order as such. This article argues, however, that the totalizing ambition of the modern political project is most fully realized not on the plane of political order, but on the plane of a “post-political” technological order sprung from the same underlying ontological judgments as liberalism, but deeper and more comprehensive than politics. This technological order, which takes on a life of its own in imitation of nature as organism, is “post-political” in that it makes possible new forms of political action without political deliberation or political responsibility, or ultimately political control.
Similar Articles
- Christina Bambrick, The Promise of Virtue, Old and New , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Joseph M Knippenberg, Liberalism and Religion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Michael Federici, Russell Kirk's Defense of the American Tradition , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Daniel I. O’Neill, Reply to Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Scott Robinson, On the Use and Abuse of John Locke for Life , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Luke C Sheahan, Robert Nisbet , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Mark G Malvasi, Kirk among the Historians , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Brianne Wolf, Tocqueville and the Moral Economy of Bankruptcy in Nineteenth-Century America , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Ted V McAllister, What Does Burke Have to Do With America? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- James Piereson, Party Government , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 12 (1982): Symposium: Political Parties and the Madisonian Model
- Robert A Heineman, E Pluribus Unum? Recent Critiques of Liberal Democracy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 13 (1983): Reviews
- Thomas Molnar, Kakotopia , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- Zachariah Black, Jesting with Giants , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- George J Graham, Latent Madisonianism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 2 (1972): Reviews
- Bruce P Frohnen, Editor’s Note , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Lloyd Jensen, Quantitative International Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- Russell Kirk, Humane Letters and the Clutch of Ideology , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- George W Carey, Editor’s Note , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 34 (2005): Eric Voegelin’s <em>New Science of Politics</em>: A 50th Anniversary Symposium
- John H Hallowell, Existence in Tension , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 2 (1972): Reviews