Keywords
Anti-Liberalism
Conservatism
Liberal order
Technocracy
Biotechnology
Post-political
How to Cite
Abstract
Modern politics is characterized by the absolutization of political order as such. This article argues, however, that the totalizing ambition of the modern political project is most fully realized not on the plane of political order, but on the plane of a “post-political” technological order sprung from the same underlying ontological judgments as liberalism, but deeper and more comprehensive than politics. This technological order, which takes on a life of its own in imitation of nature as organism, is “post-political” in that it makes possible new forms of political action without political deliberation or political responsibility, or ultimately political control.
Similar Articles
- Christina Bambrick, The Promise of Virtue, Old and New , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Joseph M Knippenberg, Liberalism and Religion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Michael Federici, Russell Kirk's Defense of the American Tradition , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Daniel I. O’Neill, Reply to Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Scott Robinson, On the Use and Abuse of John Locke for Life , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Luke C Sheahan, Robert Nisbet , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Mark G Malvasi, Kirk among the Historians , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Brianne Wolf, Tocqueville and the Moral Economy of Bankruptcy in Nineteenth-Century America , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Ted V McAllister, What Does Burke Have to Do With America? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- William G Andrews, AEI’s At the Polls—Howard Penniman , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 12 (1982): Symposium: Political Parties and the Madisonian Model
- Richard J Bishirjian, Thomas Hill Green’s Political Philosophy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- George J Graham, Jacques Ellul — Prophetic or Apocalyptic Theologian of Technology? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 13 (1983): Reviews
- Mark Blitz, Strauss’s Laws , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 20 (1991): Reviews
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger’s Nietzsche , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 22 (1993): Essays
- John C Caiazza, Natural Right and the Re-Discovery of Design in Contemporary Cosmology , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 25 (1996): The State of Political Science: A Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Symposium
- Danny M Adkison, The Federalist and Original Intent , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Martin D Yaffe, Biblical Religion and Liberal Democracy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 23 (1994): Essays
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger’s Nietzsche , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 23 (1994): Essays
- John A Murley, Our Character Is Our Fate , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium