Keywords
Conservatism
Liberalism
How to Cite
Abstract
Many scholars have written about F.A. Hayek’s influence on postwar Anglo-American political thought, and many scholars have written about how interwar economic debates informed his turn from socialism to liberalism, but few have analyzed the philosophical foundations of his political thought. Those who have given cursory attention to this subject have mischaracterized it. For example, Louis Hartz (1955) erroneously claimed that Hayek was a Lockean liberal. In truth, Hayek’s political thought was grounded more upon eighteenth-century Scottish philosophers like Adam Smith and David Hume than seventeenth-century English philosophers like Locke. This article shows how Hayek saw himself building upon, and departing from, previous political philosophers and their foundational ideas.
Similar Articles
- Nathan Schlueter, Five More Questions for Antiliberal Conservatives , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- George W Carey, John Stuart Mill and Liberalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium
- Christopher Dawson, Christopher Dawson on Conservatism (1932) , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 39 (2010): Symposia on American Constitutionalism and on Religion & Politics
- Thaddeus J Kozinski, Alasdair MacIntyre’s Political Liberalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 36 (2007): A Symposium on Leo Strauss and His Students
- Timothy Fuller, Maurice Cowling, 1926–2005 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Daniel J Mahoney, Beyond the “Prison of the Corollaries” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Timothy Burns, Virtuous Liberalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 28 (1999): Martin Diamond’s Contribution to American Political Thought: A Symposium
- Robert Webking, Liberalism and the Environment , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- Christian Bay, Hayek’s Liberalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 1 (1971): Reviews
- David B Frisk, Gottfried’s Disconnect , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany