Keywords
Conservatism
Liberalism
How to Cite
Abstract
Many scholars have written about F.A. Hayek’s influence on postwar Anglo-American political thought, and many scholars have written about how interwar economic debates informed his turn from socialism to liberalism, but few have analyzed the philosophical foundations of his political thought. Those who have given cursory attention to this subject have mischaracterized it. For example, Louis Hartz (1955) erroneously claimed that Hayek was a Lockean liberal. In truth, Hayek’s political thought was grounded more upon eighteenth-century Scottish philosophers like Adam Smith and David Hume than seventeenth-century English philosophers like Locke. This article shows how Hayek saw himself building upon, and departing from, previous political philosophers and their foundational ideas.
Similar Articles
- Daniel I. O’Neill, Reply to Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Brianne Wolf, Tocqueville and the Moral Economy of Bankruptcy in Nineteenth-Century America , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Lee Trepanier, Eric Voegelin and Political Economy: An Introduction , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Scott Robinson, On the Use and Abuse of John Locke for Life , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Luke C Sheahan, Robert Nisbet , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Phillip Pinell, Thinking and Political Considerations , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Christina Bambrick, The Promise of Virtue, Old and New , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Jeffrey Church, Elisabeth Ellis, Nicholas Tampio, Robert S. Taylor, Peter J. Steinberger, Michael Kryluk, Author Meets Critics: Jeffrey Church's Kant, Liberalism, and the Meaning of Life , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Joseph M Knippenberg, Liberalism and Religion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Ted V McAllister, What Does Burke Have to Do With America? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Clemens Kauffmann, Men on Horseback , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Laurin A Wollan, Crosskey’s Once and Future Constitution , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Raoul Berger, A Political Scientist as Constitutional Lawyer , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- William Allen, Washington and Franklin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- John C Caiazza, Sociobiology and Human Nature , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 18 (1988): Reviews
- Angelo M Codevilla, On Comparing Governments , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- Allen D Nelson, Science and Values , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- Donald J Maletz, On the Revival of Hegelian Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 13 (1983): Reviews
- Wendell John Coats, Some Correspondence Between Oakeshott’s “Civil Condition” and the Republican Tradition , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott
- Richard G Stevens, The Prospects for Constitutional Law , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium