Keywords
Conservatism
Liberalism
How to Cite
Abstract
Many scholars have written about F.A. Hayek’s influence on postwar Anglo-American political thought, and many scholars have written about how interwar economic debates informed his turn from socialism to liberalism, but few have analyzed the philosophical foundations of his political thought. Those who have given cursory attention to this subject have mischaracterized it. For example, Louis Hartz (1955) erroneously claimed that Hayek was a Lockean liberal. In truth, Hayek’s political thought was grounded more upon eighteenth-century Scottish philosophers like Adam Smith and David Hume than seventeenth-century English philosophers like Locke. This article shows how Hayek saw himself building upon, and departing from, previous political philosophers and their foundational ideas.
Similar Articles
- Daniel I. O’Neill, Reply to Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Brianne Wolf, Tocqueville and the Moral Economy of Bankruptcy in Nineteenth-Century America , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Lee Trepanier, Eric Voegelin and Political Economy: An Introduction , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Scott Robinson, On the Use and Abuse of John Locke for Life , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Luke C Sheahan, Robert Nisbet , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Phillip Pinell, Thinking and Political Considerations , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Christina Bambrick, The Promise of Virtue, Old and New , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Jeffrey Church, Elisabeth Ellis, Nicholas Tampio, Robert S. Taylor, Peter J. Steinberger, Michael Kryluk, Author Meets Critics: Jeffrey Church's Kant, Liberalism, and the Meaning of Life , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Joseph M Knippenberg, Liberalism and Religion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Ted V McAllister, What Does Burke Have to Do With America? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Joel Kassiola, Feyerabend’s Against Method: Epistemology and Political Inquiry , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- Gordon Lloyd, Let Justice Be Our Guide , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Donald Atwell Zoll, The Social Thought of Russell Kirk , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 2 (1972): Reviews
- Christopher Colmo, Freedom, Nature, and Community , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium
- Mulford Q Sibley, The Nature of Radical Man , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- George Anastaplo, The Occasions of Freedom of Speech , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Michael Dillon, Modernity and Authority in Bertrand de Jouvenel , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Joshua Bowman, Introduction: Political Theory and Political Leadership , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Barry Cooper, Recent Studies on Marx , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 2 (1972): Reviews
- Margee M Ensign, Warren R Phillips, The Status of Theory in Foreign Policy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews