Keywords
Rousseau
How to Cite
Abstract
What is the role of entertainment in contemporary democratic society? While Rousseau is not himself a democrat, his insights into the value of entertainment are valuable for those dealing with the question in democratic theory. Rousseau finds that entertainment can shape politics, but there is a need to differentiate between healthy and corrupt forms of entertainment. Focusing on his Letter to M. D’Alembert on Spectaclesand Considerations on Poland, we detail Rousseau’s distinction between good and bad entertainments. For Rousseau, bad entertainments are frivolous, they isolate people, impose an economic burden, and degrade public morals. Good entertainments are honest and simple, communal, inspire virtue, and foster patriotism. By making this distinction, we can begin to think more critically about cultivating good entertainments and reassess the role of entertainment in democratic life.
Similar Articles
- D M Yeager, “The Deliberate Holding of Unproven Beliefs” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 37 (2008): Symposium: The Life and Work of Michael Polanyi
- John C Caiazza, Political Dilemmas of Social Biology , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 34 (2005): Eric Voegelin’s <em>New Science of Politics</em>: A 50th Anniversary Symposium
- Barry Cooper, Hans Kelsen and Eric Voegelin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Hans-Ludwig Buchholz, Let There Be Text , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Gerald Mara, Re-Reading Plato's Timaeus-Critias Politically , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Noah Stengl, Tocqueville in the Wilderness , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Bernat Torres Morales, Josep Monserrat Molas, The Significance of Plato’s Philebus in the Philosophy of Eric Voegelin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Barry Cooper, Glenn Hughes, S.F. McGuire, Carol Cooper, Tilo Schabert, Author Meets Critics: Tilo Schabert's The Figure of Modernity: On the Irregularity of an Epoch , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Sandrine Baume, Emancipation from the Legal Order , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Richard Avramenko, Editor’s Note , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany