Keywords
Rousseau
How to Cite
Abstract
What is the role of entertainment in contemporary democratic society? While Rousseau is not himself a democrat, his insights into the value of entertainment are valuable for those dealing with the question in democratic theory. Rousseau finds that entertainment can shape politics, but there is a need to differentiate between healthy and corrupt forms of entertainment. Focusing on his Letter to M. D’Alembert on Spectaclesand Considerations on Poland, we detail Rousseau’s distinction between good and bad entertainments. For Rousseau, bad entertainments are frivolous, they isolate people, impose an economic burden, and degrade public morals. Good entertainments are honest and simple, communal, inspire virtue, and foster patriotism. By making this distinction, we can begin to think more critically about cultivating good entertainments and reassess the role of entertainment in democratic life.
Similar Articles
- Max Smith, Machiavelli's Democratic Civil Religion in the Discourses on Livy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Sarah Gustafson, Opening the American Heart , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Emily B. Finley, Jefferson's Democratic Idealism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Brianne Wolf, Tocqueville and the Moral Economy of Bankruptcy in Nineteenth-Century America , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Ronald M Peters, Political Theory, Political Science, and A Preface to Democratic Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 7 (1977): Reviews
- Matthew D. Mendham, A Flawed Moralist? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Nadia Urbinati, About Democracy’s Friends , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Michelle Schwarze, Freedom and Dependence in John Adams and the Fear of American Oligarchy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Joel D Wolfe, Varieties of Participatory Democracy and Democratic Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 16 (1986): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Christie Maloyed, Hypocrisy and Democratic Leadership in Benjamin Franklin’s Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kevin M. Cherry, Cicero on Factions, Statesmen, and the Mixed Regime , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Travis D. Smith, Introduction to Wit in the History of Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Mark Blitz, The Political Significance of Heidegger’s “Being and Time” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Charles E Butterworth, Robert H. Horwitz, 1923-1987 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Marshall DeRosa, M.E. Bradford’s Constitutional Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium
- Andrew Patner, Larry Arnhart, Laurence Berns, John A Murley, Stephen Vanderslice, Christopher Colmo, A Roundtable Discussion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium
- Russell Kirk, Comments on Zoll’s “Social Thought of Russell Kirk” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- Richard G Stevens, Liberal Democracy and Justice in the Constitution of Walter Berns , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 22 (1993): Essays
- David Easton, Systems Analysis and Its Classical Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- Raleigh Smith, In Re George Anastaplo, Constitutionalist , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews