Keywords
Arendt
Leadership
Rule
How to Cite
Abstract
While it is well known that Arendt was highly critical of the concept of rule, she also provides to the careful reader a positive conception of leadership that has not been sufficiently explored by scholars. This positive conception of leadership not only plays an important (though little- recognized) role in Arendt’s thought but also can help us think through the problem of what it means to be a democratic leader. This essay compares and contrasts Arendt’s ideas on leadership and on rule with those of Abraham Lincoln. At times, Lincoln’s words and deeds resonate with Arendt’s understanding of leadership and with her critique of rule; however, Lincoln can also help us see some of the shortcomings of Arendt’s ideas on these matters. The key differences between Arendt’s and Lincoln’s ideas on leadership and on rule are ultimately rooted in their proponents’ very different understandings of the meaning and the significance of the Declaration of Independence.
Similar Articles
- Brent Edwin Cusher, Thucydides on Innovative Leadership and its Limits , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Leah Bradshaw, Hannah Arendt: The German Years , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Christie Maloyed, Hypocrisy and Democratic Leadership in Benjamin Franklin’s Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Emily B. Finley, Jefferson's Democratic Idealism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- D M Yeager, “The Deliberate Holding of Unproven Beliefs” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 37 (2008): Symposium: The Life and Work of Michael Polanyi
- Zachary K. German, The Visible Hands of Statesmanship , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- James Read, From Missouri Compromise to “House Divided” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Forrest Nabors, Athenian and Lacedemonian Confederacies , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Joshua Bowman, Introduction: Political Theory and Political Leadership , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Onur Ulas Ince, Political Economy and Edmund Burke’s (Il)Liberal Logic of Empire , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Jonathan O'Neill, Traditionalist Conservatism and the Administrative State , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Michael Hanby, Before and After Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- John von Heyking, Steven F. McGuire, Glenn Hughes, Henrik Syse, Barry Cooper, Symposium: Barry Cooper’s Consciousness and Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- James Read, From Missouri Compromise to “House Divided” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Bradley Birzer, Leviathan, Inc , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Brandon Turner, O’Neill on Burke’s Not-Particularly- Conservative Logic of Empire , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Andrew Sabl, Nadia Urbinati, James Read, S. Adam Seagrave, Michelle Schwarze, Luke Mayville, Author Meets Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Timothy Fuller, Maurice Cowling, 1926–2005 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Emmanuel Patard, Supplement and Corrections to “The Strauss-Voegelin Correspondence” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 39 (2010): Symposia on American Constitutionalism and on Religion & Politics
- Timothy Fuller, Pfeffer Merrill, Avramenko, and Planinc on Eric Voegelin’s Use of Classical Political Science , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients