Keywords
American constitutionalism
liberalism
Supreme Court
common law
How to Cite
Abstract
Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States advances American constitutionalism as a synthesis of two sources: common law principles and Lockean natural rights philosophy. Many have viewed this work as a supplemental education for lawyers and judges, but this interpretation disregards Story’s stated intent for the work. Instead, this paper takes seriously Story’s goal and evaluates the Commentaries as a project of civic education. Story presents a developmental account that centers on the American people, following their adoption of specific aspects of the common law, to their unity in opposition to Great Britain, and finally to their adoption of a government based on consent. By incorporating an American common law into the basis of American life, Story seeks to stabilize the republican order and provide a richer account of the rights articulated at the founding and the duties required for self-government.
Similar Articles
- Lee Trepanier, Nomos, Nature, and Modernity in Brague’s The Law of God , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 38 (2009): A Symposium on Rémi Brague’s <em>The Law of God: The Philosophical History of an Idea</em>
- Dustin Sebell, An Achilles Without a Zeus , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Mark Hoipkemier, Adam Smith and Gaston Fessard on the Roots of Authority , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Andrew Sabl, Introduction to Forum on Luke Mayville, John Adams and the Fear of American Oligarchy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- John Boersma, Adam Smith’s Eulogy for Self-Command , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Nadia Urbinati, About Democracy’s Friends , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Lee Trepanier, Introduction to Symposium , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Alex Aichinger, The Court and the Temptations of Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott
- Richard B Friedman, What Is a Non-Instrumental Law? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott
- Guy Poitras, Change and Latin American Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany