Keywords
liberalism
self-interest
Religion and Politics
How to Cite
Abstract
The doctrine of interest well understood (intérêt bien entendu), is one of Alexis de Tocqueville’s most notable concepts. However, there is considerable disagreement about what this means and what Tocqueville argues it accomplishes for democratic peoples. This article reconstructs Tocqueville’s account of human nature as interested, political, and religious and suggests Tocqueville develops intérêt bien entendu and largely understands it in Christian terms. Appreciating the Christian dimensions of intérêt bien entendu deepens our understanding of Tocqueville’s role as a democratic moralist, the relationship of interest to virtue in his thought, and the character of Tocquevillian civil society.
Similar Articles
- Richard W Crosby, Carl Friedrich’s Empirical Theory of Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- Alex Aichinger, The Court and the Temptations of Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott
- David Mapel, Purpose and Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott
- Thomas Molnar, Is Technology Ideological? The Other Face of Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 18 (1988): Reviews
- David Broyles, American Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 12 (1982): Symposium: Political Parties and the Madisonian Model
- Richard M Gamble, The United States as World Savior , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 38 (2009): A Symposium on Rémi Brague’s <em>The Law of God: The Philosophical History of an Idea</em>
- Tony Clark, Polanyi on Epistemology, Worship, and Theology , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 37 (2008): Symposium: The Life and Work of Michael Polanyi
- D M Yeager, “The Deliberate Holding of Unproven Beliefs” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 37 (2008): Symposium: The Life and Work of Michael Polanyi
- William F Byrne, Edmund Burke and the Politics of Empire , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 37 (2008): Symposium: The Life and Work of Michael Polanyi
- Thaddeus J Kozinski, Alasdair MacIntyre’s Political Liberalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 36 (2007): A Symposium on Leo Strauss and His Students
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany