Keywords
liberalism
self-interest
Religion and Politics
How to Cite
Abstract
The doctrine of interest well understood (intérêt bien entendu), is one of Alexis de Tocqueville’s most notable concepts. However, there is considerable disagreement about what this means and what Tocqueville argues it accomplishes for democratic peoples. This article reconstructs Tocqueville’s account of human nature as interested, political, and religious and suggests Tocqueville develops intérêt bien entendu and largely understands it in Christian terms. Appreciating the Christian dimensions of intérêt bien entendu deepens our understanding of Tocqueville’s role as a democratic moralist, the relationship of interest to virtue in his thought, and the character of Tocquevillian civil society.
Similar Articles
- Douglas Walker, Michael Giles, Tocqueville Reconsidered: On Secular Morality and Religion’s Place in Liberal Democracy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Lee Trepanier, Eric Voegelin and Political Economy: An Introduction , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Michael Hanby, Before and After Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Trevor Shelley, Tocquevillean Poetics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Daniel J. Mahoney, With Reason Attentive to Grace , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Travis D. Smith, Introduction to Wit in the History of Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Max Smith, Machiavelli's Democratic Civil Religion in the Discourses on Livy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Brianne Wolf, Tocqueville and the Moral Economy of Bankruptcy in Nineteenth-Century America , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Joseph M Knippenberg, Liberalism and Religion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Kevin Vance, Shaping Religious Institutions for Liberty , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Donald W Livingston, David Hume , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 18 (1988): Reviews
- Gregory R Johnson, Heidegger’s Republic? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 25 (1996): The State of Political Science: A Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Symposium
- Richard G Stevens, The Constitution and What It Means to Corwin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- SJ James V. Schall, Man for Himself , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 15 (1985): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Marc D Guerra, Living the Theologico-Political Problem , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 28 (1999): Martin Diamond’s Contribution to American Political Thought: A Symposium
- Paul K Pollock, Is The Federalist Anti-Party? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 12 (1982): Symposium: Political Parties and the Madisonian Model
- Jerome J Hanus, Political Science , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 25 (1996): The State of Political Science: A Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Symposium
- Byrum Carter, J Gus Liebenow, Charles S. Hyneman, May 5, 1900 - January 20, 1985 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 15 (1985): In Memoriam and Reviews
- David Garnham, Joseph Lepgold, Is There a Case for Strategic Disengagement? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 15 (1985): In Memoriam and Reviews
- David Schaefer, Rawls Redux , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 25 (1996): The State of Political Science: A Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Symposium