Keywords
liberalism
self-interest
Religion and Politics
How to Cite
Abstract
The doctrine of interest well understood (intérêt bien entendu), is one of Alexis de Tocqueville’s most notable concepts. However, there is considerable disagreement about what this means and what Tocqueville argues it accomplishes for democratic peoples. This article reconstructs Tocqueville’s account of human nature as interested, political, and religious and suggests Tocqueville develops intérêt bien entendu and largely understands it in Christian terms. Appreciating the Christian dimensions of intérêt bien entendu deepens our understanding of Tocqueville’s role as a democratic moralist, the relationship of interest to virtue in his thought, and the character of Tocquevillian civil society.
Similar Articles
- Douglas Walker, Michael Giles, Tocqueville Reconsidered: On Secular Morality and Religion’s Place in Liberal Democracy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Lee Trepanier, Eric Voegelin and Political Economy: An Introduction , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Michael Hanby, Before and After Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Trevor Shelley, Tocquevillean Poetics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Daniel J. Mahoney, With Reason Attentive to Grace , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Travis D. Smith, Introduction to Wit in the History of Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Max Smith, Machiavelli's Democratic Civil Religion in the Discourses on Livy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Brianne Wolf, Tocqueville and the Moral Economy of Bankruptcy in Nineteenth-Century America , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Joseph M Knippenberg, Liberalism and Religion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Kevin Vance, Shaping Religious Institutions for Liberty , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Harvey Flaumenhaft, Hamilton on The Foundation of Government , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 6 (1976): Reviews
- Paul Norton, The Three Elites of C. Wright Mills , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- William Allen, The Constitutionalism of The Federalist Papers , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 19 (1990): Symposium: <em>The Federalist</em>
- Gordon Lloyd, The Intellectual Socialism of John Kenneth Galbraith , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- Joel D Wolfe, Varieties of Participatory Democracy and Democratic Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 16 (1986): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Thomas Molnar, Is Technology Ideological? The Other Face of Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 18 (1988): Reviews
- Richard B Friedman, What Is a Non-Instrumental Law? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott
- David Schaefer, Shadia Drury’s Critique of Leo Strauss , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 23 (1994): Essays
- Edward J Erler, Public Policy and the “New Equality” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 8 (1978): Reviews
- Gregory Bruce Smith, Cacophony or Silence , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 18 (1988): Reviews