Keywords
Martin Heidegger
Anaximander
The Anaximander Fragment
Political Order
Metaphysics
Continental Philosophy
How to Cite
Abstract
Heidegger and Voegelin's respective analyses of the Anaximander fragment provide a rare opportunity to compare their thinking on a political theme: dike (order, justice). This paper highlights the distinctly Augustinian flavor of Heidegger's interpretation of the fragment. Following a philosophically similar insight, Voegelin furthers his analysis by situating Anaximander's fragment within a larger set of empirical observations of experiences of order. This allows him to better describe what he sees as the ultimate source of order in the Anaximandrian sense. Voegelin's further step of empirically exploring the philosophical insights garnered from the fragment is of decisive importance insofar as it helps Voegelin to avoid the dangers of philosophical abstraction native to political thought.
Similar Articles
- Bernat Torres Morales, Josep Monserrat Molas, The Significance of Plato’s Philebus in the Philosophy of Eric Voegelin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Barry Cooper, Glenn Hughes, S.F. McGuire, Carol Cooper, Tilo Schabert, Author Meets Critics: Tilo Schabert's The Figure of Modernity: On the Irregularity of an Epoch , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- J. David Franks, Apocalypse of Reality , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Jacqueline Pfeffer Merrill, Voegelin on Aristotle’s “Science of the Polis” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Lee Trepanier, Eric Voegelin and Political Economy: An Introduction , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Lee Trepanier, Eric Voegelin on Race, Hitler, and National Socialism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Michael Hanby, Before and After Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Grant Havers, Voegelin, Marx, and the "Evils" of Capitalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Gregory M. Collins, Eric Voegelin on the Constitutional and Metaphysical Foundations of Property Rights in U.S. Supreme Court Jurisprudence , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- John von Heyking, “Had Every Athenian Citizen Been a Socrates” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Paul Gottfried, Response to Contributors , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Lida Maxwell, Burke, Cultural Difference, and the Problem of Imperial Critique , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Victor Ferkiss, Daniel Bell’s Concept of Post-Industrial Society , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 9 (1979): Reviews
- Samuel Garrett Zeitlin, Francis Bacon on Just Warfare , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 1 (2021): Symposium: Music in Plato's Political Thought
- S. Adam Seagrave, John Adams the Locke-Smith? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Andrew Sabl, Introduction to Forum on Luke Mayville, John Adams and the Fear of American Oligarchy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Ashleen Menchaca-Bagnulo, Predatory Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Burke A. Hendrix, Edmund Burke, Native Americans, and the Burkean Imagination , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Daniel I. O’Neill, Reply to Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Michelle Schwarze, Freedom and Dependence in John Adams and the Fear of American Oligarchy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany