Keywords
Labor
Work
How to Cite
Abstract
Attempting to explain the American attachment to work, this article examines two traditions of defending work and labor, referred to here as “egalitarian” and “inegalitarian.” Representing the egalitarian tradition are Abraham Lincoln and Wendell Berry, and representing the inegalitarian are Thomas Jefferson and Ralph Waldo Emerson. Although there is overlap between the two traditions, the issue of equality separates American thinking on work and labor and reveals differing accounts of independence. Laying bare these sometimes conflicting arguments also provides an opportunity to think through contemporary issues, such as the so-called “Great Resignation.” I contend that recent trends do not suggest a giving up on work, but rather reflect the demand for work to have a particular relationship with equality.
Similar Articles
- Peter Augustine Lawler, Introduction , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 36 (2007): A Symposium on Leo Strauss and His Students
- Joshua J Bowman, Russell Kirk and Redemptive Conservation , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Giunia Gatta, Between Politics and Suprapolitics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Michael Promisel, Why Character Matters , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Trevor Shelley, Tocquevillean Poetics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Walter Gulick, Michael and Karl Polanyi , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 37 (2008): Symposium: The Life and Work of Michael Polanyi
- Robert A Heineman, Edmund Burke and the American Nation , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Kristen Collins, Sensibility and Self-Command in Adam Smith’s Approach to Political Judgment , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Sara Henary, The “Best Fence” against Nature’s Ambiguity , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Manfred Henningsen, The Kelsen-Voegelin Controversies , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany