Keywords
Labor
Work
How to Cite
Abstract
Attempting to explain the American attachment to work, this article examines two traditions of defending work and labor, referred to here as “egalitarian” and “inegalitarian.” Representing the egalitarian tradition are Abraham Lincoln and Wendell Berry, and representing the inegalitarian are Thomas Jefferson and Ralph Waldo Emerson. Although there is overlap between the two traditions, the issue of equality separates American thinking on work and labor and reveals differing accounts of independence. Laying bare these sometimes conflicting arguments also provides an opportunity to think through contemporary issues, such as the so-called “Great Resignation.” I contend that recent trends do not suggest a giving up on work, but rather reflect the demand for work to have a particular relationship with equality.
Similar Articles
- Rachel Alexander Cambre, Women and the Virtue of Friendship in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Aaron Kushner, Stephen Clouse, Citizenship and the Good Life , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- S. Adam Seagrave, John Adams the Locke-Smith? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Sarah Gustafson, Opening the American Heart , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Ben Peterson, The Roots of "Authentic Democracy" , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Michelle Schwarze, Freedom and Dependence in John Adams and the Fear of American Oligarchy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Barry Cooper, Glenn Hughes, S.F. McGuire, Carol Cooper, Tilo Schabert, Author Meets Critics: Tilo Schabert's The Figure of Modernity: On the Irregularity of an Epoch , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Kirstin Anderson Birkhaug, Margaretta, Trojan Horse , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Zachary K. German, The Visible Hands of Statesmanship , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Bernat Torres Morales, Josep Monserrat Molas, The Significance of Plato’s Philebus in the Philosophy of Eric Voegelin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Clemens Kauffmann, Men on Horseback , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Laurin A Wollan, Crosskey’s Once and Future Constitution , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Raoul Berger, A Political Scientist as Constitutional Lawyer , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- William Allen, Washington and Franklin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- John C Caiazza, Sociobiology and Human Nature , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 18 (1988): Reviews
- Angelo M Codevilla, On Comparing Governments , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- Allen D Nelson, Science and Values , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- Donald J Maletz, On the Revival of Hegelian Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 13 (1983): Reviews
- Wendell John Coats, Some Correspondence Between Oakeshott’s “Civil Condition” and the Republican Tradition , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott
- Richard G Stevens, The Prospects for Constitutional Law , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium