Keywords
Labor
Work
How to Cite
Abstract
Attempting to explain the American attachment to work, this article examines two traditions of defending work and labor, referred to here as “egalitarian” and “inegalitarian.” Representing the egalitarian tradition are Abraham Lincoln and Wendell Berry, and representing the inegalitarian are Thomas Jefferson and Ralph Waldo Emerson. Although there is overlap between the two traditions, the issue of equality separates American thinking on work and labor and reveals differing accounts of independence. Laying bare these sometimes conflicting arguments also provides an opportunity to think through contemporary issues, such as the so-called “Great Resignation.” I contend that recent trends do not suggest a giving up on work, but rather reflect the demand for work to have a particular relationship with equality.
Similar Articles
- Rachel Alexander Cambre, Women and the Virtue of Friendship in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Aaron Kushner, Stephen Clouse, Citizenship and the Good Life , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- S. Adam Seagrave, John Adams the Locke-Smith? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Sarah Gustafson, Opening the American Heart , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Ben Peterson, The Roots of "Authentic Democracy" , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Michelle Schwarze, Freedom and Dependence in John Adams and the Fear of American Oligarchy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Barry Cooper, Glenn Hughes, S.F. McGuire, Carol Cooper, Tilo Schabert, Author Meets Critics: Tilo Schabert's The Figure of Modernity: On the Irregularity of an Epoch , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Kirstin Anderson Birkhaug, Margaretta, Trojan Horse , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Zachary K. German, The Visible Hands of Statesmanship , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Bernat Torres Morales, Josep Monserrat Molas, The Significance of Plato’s Philebus in the Philosophy of Eric Voegelin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Alan Gibson, America’s Better Self , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 28 (1999): Martin Diamond’s Contribution to American Political Thought: A Symposium
- Bruce M Fingerhut, Look for the Lift , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Gerald J Galgan, Reinterpreting the Middle Ages , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 14 (1984): Reviews
- Joseph E Goldberg, Sheldon Wolin’s Vision of Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- Fred Kort, The Works of Glendon Schubert , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- Eugene F Miller, Locke on the Meaning of Political Language , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 9 (1979): Reviews
- Ralph Rossum, James Wilson and the “Pyramid of Government” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 6 (1976): Reviews
- Bernard Semmel, John Stuart Mill’s Coleridgian Neoradicalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium
- Wayne Allen, John Stanley (1938–1998) , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 28 (1999): Martin Diamond’s Contribution to American Political Thought: A Symposium
- Eldon Eisenach, Mill’s Reform Liberalism as Tradition and Culture , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium