Keywords
Anna Karenina
19th Century Russia
Cosmopolitanism
19th Century Russia
Cosmopolitanism
How to Cite
Anna Karenina: The Tragic Heroine of a Liquid Society. (2022). The Political Science Reviewer, 46(2), 177-196. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/725
Abstract
In Anna Karenina, Leo Tolstoy creates a unique heroine--a tragic heroine of love. However, his depiction of Anna's "love-at-any-cost" approach reveals her inability to reflect on the various facets of love and friendship. In telling the story in this way, Tolstoy is not merely conveying a powerfully tragic story about one individual, he is depicting a profound weakness of modern, cosmopolitan society itself. In essense, Anna's story is a conceptually "liquid society" that turns her into a tragive victim of forces much larger than herself.
Similar Articles
- Timothy Fuller, Pfeffer Merrill, Avramenko, and Planinc on Eric Voegelin’s Use of Classical Political Science , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Gianna Englert, Democracy in America, America in France , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Lee Trepanier, Political Theology in the Twenty-first Century , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Luke C Sheahan, Robert Nisbet , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Khalil M Habib, Christianity and Western Civilization , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 2 (2017): Symposium: The Life and Work of Christopher Dawson
- Joseph M Knippenberg, Liberalism and Religion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- V Bradley Lewis, Gerhart Niemeyer , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Robert A Heineman, Edmund Burke and the American Nation , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Dermot Quinn, Religion and The Conservative Mind , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Clemens Kauffmann, Men on Horseback , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Laurin A Wollan, Crosskey’s Once and Future Constitution , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Raoul Berger, A Political Scientist as Constitutional Lawyer , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- William Allen, Washington and Franklin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- John C Caiazza, Sociobiology and Human Nature , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 18 (1988): Reviews
- Angelo M Codevilla, On Comparing Governments , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- Allen D Nelson, Science and Values , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- Donald J Maletz, On the Revival of Hegelian Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 13 (1983): Reviews
- Wendell John Coats, Some Correspondence Between Oakeshott’s “Civil Condition” and the Republican Tradition , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott
- Richard G Stevens, The Prospects for Constitutional Law , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium