Keywords
Anna Karenina
19th Century Russia
Cosmopolitanism
19th Century Russia
Cosmopolitanism
How to Cite
Anna Karenina: The Tragic Heroine of a Liquid Society. (2022). The Political Science Reviewer, 46(2), 177-196. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/725
Abstract
In Anna Karenina, Leo Tolstoy creates a unique heroine--a tragic heroine of love. However, his depiction of Anna's "love-at-any-cost" approach reveals her inability to reflect on the various facets of love and friendship. In telling the story in this way, Tolstoy is not merely conveying a powerfully tragic story about one individual, he is depicting a profound weakness of modern, cosmopolitan society itself. In essense, Anna's story is a conceptually "liquid society" that turns her into a tragive victim of forces much larger than herself.
Similar Articles
- Timothy Fuller, Pfeffer Merrill, Avramenko, and Planinc on Eric Voegelin’s Use of Classical Political Science , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Gianna Englert, Democracy in America, America in France , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Lee Trepanier, Political Theology in the Twenty-first Century , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Luke C Sheahan, Robert Nisbet , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Khalil M Habib, Christianity and Western Civilization , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 2 (2017): Symposium: The Life and Work of Christopher Dawson
- Joseph M Knippenberg, Liberalism and Religion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- V Bradley Lewis, Gerhart Niemeyer , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Robert A Heineman, Edmund Burke and the American Nation , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Dermot Quinn, Religion and The Conservative Mind , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Alexander J Groth, Michael Parenti and American Democracy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- Richard Avramenko, Notes on Contributors , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Richard Avramenko, Notes on Contributors , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Walter Berns, Free Speech and Free Government , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 2 (1972): Reviews
- Samuel T Francis, Power and History , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 12 (1982): Symposium: Political Parties and the Madisonian Model
- Michael Promisel, Why Character Matters , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Jerry Weinberger, But Which Gods Will Save Us? The Political Legacy of Nietzsche and Heidegger , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 16 (1986): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Nicholas Capaldi, John Stuart Mill’s Defense of Liberal Culture , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium
- David DesRosiers, “The Team Against the Committee” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Ronald M Peters, Political Theory, Political Science, and A Preface to Democratic Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 7 (1977): Reviews