Keywords
Anna Karenina
19th Century Russia
Cosmopolitanism
19th Century Russia
Cosmopolitanism
How to Cite
Anna Karenina: The Tragic Heroine of a Liquid Society. (2022). The Political Science Reviewer, 46(2), 177-196. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/725
Abstract
In Anna Karenina, Leo Tolstoy creates a unique heroine--a tragic heroine of love. However, his depiction of Anna's "love-at-any-cost" approach reveals her inability to reflect on the various facets of love and friendship. In telling the story in this way, Tolstoy is not merely conveying a powerfully tragic story about one individual, he is depicting a profound weakness of modern, cosmopolitan society itself. In essense, Anna's story is a conceptually "liquid society" that turns her into a tragive victim of forces much larger than herself.
Similar Articles
- Timothy Fuller, Pfeffer Merrill, Avramenko, and Planinc on Eric Voegelin’s Use of Classical Political Science , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Gianna Englert, Democracy in America, America in France , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Lee Trepanier, Political Theology in the Twenty-first Century , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Luke C Sheahan, Robert Nisbet , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Khalil M Habib, Christianity and Western Civilization , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 2 (2017): Symposium: The Life and Work of Christopher Dawson
- Joseph M Knippenberg, Liberalism and Religion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- V Bradley Lewis, Gerhart Niemeyer , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Robert A Heineman, Edmund Burke and the American Nation , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Dermot Quinn, Religion and The Conservative Mind , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Ian A T McLean, The Fuzzy Picture of Hitler’s Pope , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Thomas S Engeman, George C S Benson, Dewey, Freud, and American Morality , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- John C Koritansky, Response to Morton J. Frisch and to Martin Diamond , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 28 (1999): Martin Diamond’s Contribution to American Political Thought: A Symposium
- J Brian Benestad, Rev. Ernest Fortin, A.A., 1923–2002 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- George Anastaplo, Samplings , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 27 (1998): Eric Voegelin’s <em>The Ecumenic Age</em>: A Symposium
- Joel Andrew Johnson, A Discriminating Irreverence , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Dennis Hale, Arthur F. Bentley , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 13 (1983): Reviews
- Walter Nicgorski, Theory Redivivus , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 25 (1996): The State of Political Science: A Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Symposium
- Charldean Newell, Bureaucratic Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 9 (1979): Reviews
- Robert Orr, A Double Agent in the Dream of Michael Oakeshott , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott