Keywords
ideology
Abstract
deological thinking in the third sense has natural affinities with administrative centralization and a nationalization of political parties which emphasizes abstract unifying principles over the diversity of interests. It also tends to undermine the capacity for practical wisdom and independent judgement and conscience in its adherents—tendencies dramatically illustrated in Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man.
Similar Articles
- Scott Robinson, On the Use and Abuse of John Locke for Life , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Allen Mendenhall, Wisdom is Paramount , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Michael Federici, The Meaning of Conservatism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Russell Kirk, Humane Letters and the Clutch of Ideology , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- Lee Trepanier, War, Progress, and Sociology in the Age of Ideology , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 36 (2007): A Symposium on Leo Strauss and His Students
- Zdravko Planinc, Ideology and Virtue , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 14 (1984): Reviews
- Lee Trepanier, Eric Voegelin on Race, Hitler, and National Socialism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Ross Carroll, Edmund Burke, Imperialist Ideologue? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Lee Trepanier, Culture and History in Eric Voegelin and Christopher Dawson , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 2 (2017): Symposium: The Life and Work of Christopher Dawson
- Emily B. Finley, Jefferson's Democratic Idealism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Clemens Kauffmann, Men on Horseback , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Laurin A Wollan, Crosskey’s Once and Future Constitution , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Raoul Berger, A Political Scientist as Constitutional Lawyer , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- William Allen, Washington and Franklin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- John C Caiazza, Sociobiology and Human Nature , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 18 (1988): Reviews
- Angelo M Codevilla, On Comparing Governments , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- Allen D Nelson, Science and Values , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- Donald J Maletz, On the Revival of Hegelian Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 13 (1983): Reviews
- Wendell John Coats, Some Correspondence Between Oakeshott’s “Civil Condition” and the Republican Tradition , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott
- Richard G Stevens, The Prospects for Constitutional Law , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium