Keywords
Russell Kirk
Flannery O'Connor
Literature and Politics
moral imagination
Flannery O'Connor
Literature and Politics
moral imagination
How to Cite
The Moral Imagination in Flannery O’Connor and Russell Kirk. (2021). The Political Science Reviewer, 45(2), 427-452. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/717
Abstract
Flannery O’Connor and Russell Kirk are similar storytellers of the mid-twentieth century. They are comparable in many respects. Both, for instance, worry about Enlightenment ideas leading to brutal policies. They also share a conviction that stories can do more to awaken people to the dangers of abstract thinking than philosophic treatises. And though their stories share a theological orientation rooted in the Catholic faith, the stories themselves have important differences. Kirk’s stories are about ghosts and O’Connor shows how grace builds upon nature.
Similar Articles
- Joshua J Bowman, Russell Kirk and Redemptive Conservation , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Barry Cooper, Glenn Hughes, S.F. McGuire, Carol Cooper, Tilo Schabert, Author Meets Critics: Tilo Schabert's The Figure of Modernity: On the Irregularity of an Epoch , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Allen Mendenhall, Wisdom is Paramount , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Rachel Alexander Cambre, Women and the Virtue of Friendship in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Lee Trepanier, Introduction to Symposium , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Lee Trepanier, What Can Political Science Learn from Literature? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Douglas Walker, Michael Giles, Tocqueville Reconsidered: On Secular Morality and Religion’s Place in Liberal Democracy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Lee Trepanier, Eric Voegelin and Political Economy: An Introduction , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Katherine Philippakis, Michael S. Kochin, Pimps, Cuckolds, and Philosophers , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Jeff Polet, Foolish Hearts , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Eugene F Miller, Introduction , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard W Crosby, Carl Friedrich’s Empirical Theory of Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- Chester Earle, Valerie Earle, Recurring Themes, Enduring Values , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- David Lowenthal, Obscenity and the Law , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 2 (1972): Reviews
- Joseph Cropsey, Herbert J. Storing , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 7 (1977): Reviews
- Robert Webking, Liberalism and the Environment , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- Richard Sherlock, The Right to Die as Public Policy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- George J Graham, Thoughts on Ludwig Wittgenstein and Political Analysis , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Gabriel A Almond, Slaying the Functional Dragon , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- Alan Abramowitz, Heinz Eulau, Recent Research on Congress in a Democratic Perspective , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 2 (1972): Reviews