Keywords
Thomas Jefferson
Democratic Idealism
Democracy
political ideology
How to Cite
Abstract
This article contends that there is a pronounced if underappreciated side to Thomas Jefferson’s democratic vision that is decidedly undemocratic. By reexamining several of Jefferson’s core beliefs, including his agrarianism, his philosophy of education, and his desire for an “empire of liberty,” this paper elucidates a Jeffersonian vision of democracy that defers to the knowledgeable and enlightened rather than the actual, historical will of the people. Reexamining the character and quality of Jefferson’s vision helps shed light on our own fraught conception of democracy, which similarly is often torn between the desire for direct popular rule and a competing desire for rule by experts.
Similar Articles
- Nadia Urbinati, About Democracy’s Friends , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Voegelin, Marx, and the "Evils" of Capitalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Max Smith, Machiavelli's Democratic Civil Religion in the Discourses on Livy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Sarah Gustafson, Opening the American Heart , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Ben Peterson, The Roots of "Authentic Democracy" , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Michelle Schwarze, Freedom and Dependence in John Adams and the Fear of American Oligarchy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- John Boersma, Adam Smith’s Eulogy for Self-Command , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Douglas Walker, Michael Giles, Tocqueville Reconsidered: On Secular Morality and Religion’s Place in Liberal Democracy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- James Read, John Adams and the Unpurchased Impact of Wealth , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Lee Trepanier, Introduction to Symposium , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Ron Srigley, Monserrat, Torres, and Planinc on Voegelin’s Return to the Ancients , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- David B Frisk, Gottfried’s Disconnect , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Nicholas Higgins, Why Can’t We Be Friends? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Seth Benardete, Leo Strauss’ The City and Man , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 8 (1978): Reviews
- Onur Ulas Ince, Burke A. Hendrix, Lida Maxwell, Ross Carroll, Brandon Turner, Daniel I. O’Neill, Author Meets Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Jeff Polet, Returning to Localism as a Return to the Self , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Nathan Schlueter, Five More Questions for Antiliberal Conservatives , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Onur Ulas Ince, Political Economy and Edmund Burke’s (Il)Liberal Logic of Empire , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Russell Nieli, Critic of the Sensate Culture , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>