Keywords
wit
political theory
jest
How to Cite
Abstract
Francis Bacon (1561-1626) is best known as an advocate for human progress and the progenitor of the project that develops into what we understand as modern science. He is deeply concerned with the advancement of human learning and the ways in which knowledge is developed and shared. The success of his project, known as the Instauration, depends on both the serious application of inductive reasoning, and the skillful use of rhetoric to navigate the political world, including the judicious use of jests. Comedic in nature, jests prove to be valuable yet dangerous tools of persuasion. This article examines Bacon’s account of jest, its relationship to wit, and Bacon’s conclusion that while comedy is best understood as a philosophic vice, it may also be used as a political virtue.
Similar Articles
- Luke Foster, The Duty of the Clercs to the Nation , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Donald S Lutz, Bernard Bailyn, Gordon S. Wood, and Whig Political Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 7 (1977): Reviews
- Ronald J Terchek, Positive Political Theory and Heresthetics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 13 (1983): Reviews
- Francis H Heller, Is There a Theory of Federalism? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- Abigail Staysa, Aristotle's Political Science and the Training in Pleasures and Pains , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Grant Havers, Does Politics Need a Theology? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Jacqueline Pfeffer Merrill, Voegelin on Aristotle’s “Science of the Polis” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Michael Hanby, Before and After Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Carol B. Cooper, Hans Urs von Balthasar and the Limits of Political Theology , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany