Keywords
wit
political theory
jest
How to Cite
Abstract
Francis Bacon (1561-1626) is best known as an advocate for human progress and the progenitor of the project that develops into what we understand as modern science. He is deeply concerned with the advancement of human learning and the ways in which knowledge is developed and shared. The success of his project, known as the Instauration, depends on both the serious application of inductive reasoning, and the skillful use of rhetoric to navigate the political world, including the judicious use of jests. Comedic in nature, jests prove to be valuable yet dangerous tools of persuasion. This article examines Bacon’s account of jest, its relationship to wit, and Bacon’s conclusion that while comedy is best understood as a philosophic vice, it may also be used as a political virtue.
Similar Articles
- Travis D. Smith, Introduction to Wit in the History of Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Samuel Garrett Zeitlin, Order and Command , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Ryan McKinnell, Wit and Persuasion in Philosophic Courtiership , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Barry Cooper, Glenn Hughes, S.F. McGuire, Carol Cooper, Tilo Schabert, Author Meets Critics: Tilo Schabert's The Figure of Modernity: On the Irregularity of an Epoch , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Bernat Torres Morales, Josep Monserrat Molas, The Significance of Plato’s Philebus in the Philosophy of Eric Voegelin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Gerald Mara, Re-Reading Plato's Timaeus-Critias Politically , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Richard Avramenko, Editor’s Note , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Max Smith, Machiavelli's Democratic Civil Religion in the Discourses on Livy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Sarah Gustafson, Opening the American Heart , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Hans-Ludwig Buchholz, Let There Be Text , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Ellis Sandoz, Eric Voegelin, January 3, 1901 - January 19, 1985 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 15 (1985): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Dennis G Stevens, On Charles Beard’s Constitution , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott
- Joshua J Bowman, Russell Kirk and Redemptive Conservation , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Harry M Clor, How Much Legal Regulation of Obscenity? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- Roberta R Schaefer, David Lewis Schaefer, Democracy, Ethics, and Public Administration , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 9 (1979): Reviews
- Kent A Kirwan, Herbert S. Storing and the Study of Public Administration , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- Karl Lamb, Plotting the Electorate’s Course in Dangerous Waters , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 2 (1972): Reviews
- George W Carey, The Constitution, The Supreme Court, and Republican Government , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium
- Richard Avramenko, Editor’s Note , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Richard Loss, Dissolving Concepts of the Presidency , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews