Keywords
nietzsche
How to Cite
Democratizing Nietzsche. (2004). The Political Science Reviewer, 33, 62-89. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/431
Abstract
Political scientists in the United States today are overwhelmingly—I am tempted to say, universally—democrats. There are of course conservatives, liberals, and radicals; utilitarians, neo-Kantians, and communitarians; defenders of the free market, of classical virtue, and of the oppressed. The list goes on. But to my knowledge, no one, including myself, seriously urges people to replace democratic government with some thoroughly undemocratic regime—with an aristocracy, for example, or theocracy, or monarchy. Scholars now consider any such position beyond the pale.
Similar Articles
- Lee Trepanier, Camus, Nietzsche, and the Cartesian Subject: Political Community in Postmodernity , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Jerry Weinberger, But Which Gods Will Save Us? The Political Legacy of Nietzsche and Heidegger , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 16 (1986): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger’s Nietzsche , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 22 (1993): Essays
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger’s Nietzsche , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 23 (1994): Essays
- Robert Devigne, Plato, Nietzsche, & Strauss , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium
- Mark Blitz, A Symposium on Kant Studies , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger During the War , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Philip Bunn, Silicon Valley Stoics? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Dustin Sebell, An Achilles Without a Zeus , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kevin M. Cherry, Cicero on Factions, Statesmen, and the Mixed Regime , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Travis D. Smith, Introduction to Wit in the History of Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Mark Blitz, The Political Significance of Heidegger’s “Being and Time” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Charles E Butterworth, Robert H. Horwitz, 1923-1987 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Marshall DeRosa, M.E. Bradford’s Constitutional Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium
- Andrew Patner, Larry Arnhart, Laurence Berns, John A Murley, Stephen Vanderslice, Christopher Colmo, A Roundtable Discussion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium
- Russell Kirk, Comments on Zoll’s “Social Thought of Russell Kirk” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- Richard G Stevens, Liberal Democracy and Justice in the Constitution of Walter Berns , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 22 (1993): Essays
- David Easton, Systems Analysis and Its Classical Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- Raleigh Smith, In Re George Anastaplo, Constitutionalist , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews