Keywords
nietzsche
How to Cite
Democratizing Nietzsche. (2004). The Political Science Reviewer, 33, 62-89. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/431
Abstract
Political scientists in the United States today are overwhelmingly—I am tempted to say, universally—democrats. There are of course conservatives, liberals, and radicals; utilitarians, neo-Kantians, and communitarians; defenders of the free market, of classical virtue, and of the oppressed. The list goes on. But to my knowledge, no one, including myself, seriously urges people to replace democratic government with some thoroughly undemocratic regime—with an aristocracy, for example, or theocracy, or monarchy. Scholars now consider any such position beyond the pale.
Similar Articles
- Lee Trepanier, Camus, Nietzsche, and the Cartesian Subject: Political Community in Postmodernity , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Jerry Weinberger, But Which Gods Will Save Us? The Political Legacy of Nietzsche and Heidegger , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 16 (1986): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger’s Nietzsche , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 22 (1993): Essays
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger’s Nietzsche , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 23 (1994): Essays
- Robert Devigne, Plato, Nietzsche, & Strauss , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium
- Mark Blitz, A Symposium on Kant Studies , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger During the War , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Philip Bunn, Silicon Valley Stoics? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Dustin Sebell, An Achilles Without a Zeus , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Dennis G Stevens, On Orwell’s “1984” and Common Sense , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 14 (1984): Reviews
- Michael S. Kochin, What Political Science Needs to Learn from Science Studies , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Rene Visme Williamson, The Political Implications of the Theology of Paul Tillich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- Steven B Smith, Joseph Hamburger , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 27 (1998): Eric Voegelin’s <em>The Ecumenic Age</em>: A Symposium
- C L Ten, Mill’s Place in Liberalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium
- Morton J Frisch, Martin Diamond and Douglass Adair on The Federalist , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 28 (1999): Martin Diamond’s Contribution to American Political Thought: A Symposium
- Gerhart Niemeyer, Humanism, Positivism, Immorality , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 1 (1971): Reviews
- John P East, The Political Thought of Willmore Kendall , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- Rene Visme Williamson, The Political Impilications of the Theology of Karl Barth , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- L Earl Shaw, The Polictical Implications of the Theology of H. Richard Niebuhr , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 7 (1977): Reviews