Keywords
nietzsche
How to Cite
Democratizing Nietzsche. (2004). The Political Science Reviewer, 33, 62-89. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/431
Abstract
Political scientists in the United States today are overwhelmingly—I am tempted to say, universally—democrats. There are of course conservatives, liberals, and radicals; utilitarians, neo-Kantians, and communitarians; defenders of the free market, of classical virtue, and of the oppressed. The list goes on. But to my knowledge, no one, including myself, seriously urges people to replace democratic government with some thoroughly undemocratic regime—with an aristocracy, for example, or theocracy, or monarchy. Scholars now consider any such position beyond the pale.
Similar Articles
- Lee Trepanier, Camus, Nietzsche, and the Cartesian Subject: Political Community in Postmodernity , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Jerry Weinberger, But Which Gods Will Save Us? The Political Legacy of Nietzsche and Heidegger , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 16 (1986): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger’s Nietzsche , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 22 (1993): Essays
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger’s Nietzsche , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 23 (1994): Essays
- Robert Devigne, Plato, Nietzsche, & Strauss , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium
- Mark Blitz, A Symposium on Kant Studies , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger During the War , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Philip Bunn, Silicon Valley Stoics? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Dustin Sebell, An Achilles Without a Zeus , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- James W Muller, “A Kind of Dignity and Even Nobility” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 16 (1986): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Guy Poitras, Change and Latin American Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- Michael P Zuckert, The Recent Literature on Locke’s Political Philosophy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- George Anastaplo, Law & Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 25 (1996): The State of Political Science: A Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Symposium
- Wilson Carey McWilliams, Jouvenel on Politics and Political Science in America , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Bernhard W Anderson, Politics and the Transcendent , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 1 (1971): Reviews
- Elliott White, Sociobiology and Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 8 (1978): Reviews
- Lane Sunderland, The Constitutional Analysis of Philip B. Kurland , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 12 (1982): Symposium: Political Parties and the Madisonian Model
- Nathan Tarcov, War and Peace in The Federalist , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 19 (1990): Symposium: <em>The Federalist</em>
- George W Carey, John Stuart Mill and Liberalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium