Keywords
Voegelin
science of the polis
The New Science of Politics
How to Cite
Abstract
In his 1951 Walgreen lectures published as the New Science of Politics, Eric Voegelin calls for the restoration of political science as a science of order. This restoration is necessary because political science has fallen into a degenerate state as a Weberian, value-free social science concerned with “objective, value-free” measures of political phenomenon. Political science as a genuine science of order should be grounded on an interpretation of political societies’ symbols through which they interpret their connection to a transcendent truth. In the New Science of Politics, Voegelin both describes what would be necessary for a restoration of political science and models it in his analyses of contemporary political societies and the state of our understanding of the order of these societies. He describes his own method as “substantially the Aristotelian procedure” and reminds us that political science was initiated by Plato and Aristotle.
Similar Articles
- Timothy Fuller, Pfeffer Merrill, Avramenko, and Planinc on Eric Voegelin’s Use of Classical Political Science , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- John von Heyking, “Had Every Athenian Citizen Been a Socrates” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Barry Cooper, Hans Kelsen and Eric Voegelin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Lee Trepanier, Eric Voegelin on Race, Hitler, and National Socialism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Barry Cooper, Glenn Hughes, S.F. McGuire, Carol Cooper, Tilo Schabert, Author Meets Critics: Tilo Schabert's The Figure of Modernity: On the Irregularity of an Epoch , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Lee Trepanier, Eric Voegelin and Political Economy: An Introduction , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Stephen A McKnight, Gnosticism and Modernity , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 34 (2005): Eric Voegelin’s <em>New Science of Politics</em>: A 50th Anniversary Symposium
- Gregory M. Collins, Eric Voegelin on the Constitutional and Metaphysical Foundations of Property Rights in U.S. Supreme Court Jurisprudence , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Michael Franz, The Concept of Gnosticism and the Analysis of Spiritual Disorder , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 34 (2005): Eric Voegelin’s <em>New Science of Politics</em>: A 50th Anniversary Symposium
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kevin M. Cherry, Cicero on Factions, Statesmen, and the Mixed Regime , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Travis D. Smith, Introduction to Wit in the History of Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Mark Blitz, The Political Significance of Heidegger’s “Being and Time” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Charles E Butterworth, Robert H. Horwitz, 1923-1987 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Marshall DeRosa, M.E. Bradford’s Constitutional Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium
- Andrew Patner, Larry Arnhart, Laurence Berns, John A Murley, Stephen Vanderslice, Christopher Colmo, A Roundtable Discussion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium
- Russell Kirk, Comments on Zoll’s “Social Thought of Russell Kirk” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- Richard G Stevens, Liberal Democracy and Justice in the Constitution of Walter Berns , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 22 (1993): Essays
- David Easton, Systems Analysis and Its Classical Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- Raleigh Smith, In Re George Anastaplo, Constitutionalist , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews