Keywords
Classical Political philosophy
ancients and moderns
revealed religion
How to Cite
Abstract
ABSTRACT: For all the attention it has received, Leo Strauss’s “Restatement” tends to be seriously misunderstood. In the “Restatement,” it is true, Strauss defends the ancients against the moderns. This is obvious. Less obvious, however, is that Strauss’s defense of the ancients against the moderns depends on a defense of the ancients against revealed religion. According to the “Restatement,” that is, the ancients did what the moderns tried and failed to do: they defended themselves against revealed religion. In fact, with the possible exception of his studies of Xenophon’s Socratic writings, the “Restatement” is just about the only place where Strauss tries to explain how, by means of the Socratic refutations, they defended themselves. Finally, on the basis of Strauss’s defense of the ancients against revealed religion, the “Restatement” serves to show how the moderns, by means of the Napoleonic strategy, tried and failed to do so.
Similar Articles
- Grant Havers, Does Politics Need a Theology? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- John Boersma, Leo Strauss on the Machiavellian Moment(s) in Aristotle , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Timothy Fuller, Pfeffer Merrill, Avramenko, and Planinc on Eric Voegelin’s Use of Classical Political Science , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Daniel J. Mahoney, With Reason Attentive to Grace , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Gordon Lloyd, Steven P Ealy, The Eric Voegelin-Willmoore Kendall Correspondence , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 33 (2004): Essays
- Clemens Kauffmann, Men on Horseback , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Grant Havers, Voegelin, Marx, and the "Evils" of Capitalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Emmanuel Patard, Supplement and Corrections to “The Strauss-Voegelin Correspondence” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 39 (2010): Symposia on American Constitutionalism and on Religion & Politics
- Raph C Hancock, What Was Political Philosophy? Or , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 36 (2007): A Symposium on Leo Strauss and His Students
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Jonathan O'Neill, Traditionalist Conservatism and the Administrative State , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Michael Hanby, Before and After Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- John von Heyking, Steven F. McGuire, Glenn Hughes, Henrik Syse, Barry Cooper, Symposium: Barry Cooper’s Consciousness and Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- James Read, From Missouri Compromise to “House Divided” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Bradley Birzer, Leviathan, Inc , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Brandon Turner, O’Neill on Burke’s Not-Particularly- Conservative Logic of Empire , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Andrew Sabl, Nadia Urbinati, James Read, S. Adam Seagrave, Michelle Schwarze, Luke Mayville, Author Meets Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Timothy Fuller, Maurice Cowling, 1926–2005 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Emmanuel Patard, Supplement and Corrections to “The Strauss-Voegelin Correspondence” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 39 (2010): Symposia on American Constitutionalism and on Religion & Politics
- Timothy Fuller, Pfeffer Merrill, Avramenko, and Planinc on Eric Voegelin’s Use of Classical Political Science , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients