Keywords
Prudence
Political Leadership
Virtue
How to Cite
Abstract
Despite the rich tradition of thought proclaiming the need for virtuous leaders, and the continued, widespread call for character in those who hold political office, both scholars and citizens remain puzzled concerning the precise relation of character to political leadership. Drawing on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, this article argues that prudence is the most important virtue for political leaders and that keystone for understanding all leading character. More specifically, Aristotle’s account of prudence in the Nicomachean Ethics enumerates the three “stages” of prudential action—deliberation, comprehension, and decision—that are the primary channels wherein the moral character of political leaders influences their conduct.
Similar Articles
- Abigail Staysa, Aristotle's Political Science and the Training in Pleasures and Pains , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Rachel Alexander Cambre, Women and the Virtue of Friendship in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Zachary K. German, The Visible Hands of Statesmanship , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Catherine Craig, Sara MacDonald, Wit’s Justice in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- John Boersma, Adam Smith’s Eulogy for Self-Command , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Christina Bambrick, The Promise of Virtue, Old and New , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- John Boersma, Leo Strauss on the Machiavellian Moment(s) in Aristotle , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Jacqueline Pfeffer Merrill, Voegelin on Aristotle’s “Science of the Polis” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Christie Maloyed, Hypocrisy and Democratic Leadership in Benjamin Franklin’s Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Max Smith, Machiavelli's Democratic Civil Religion in the Discourses on Livy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Laurie M Johnson, Jung’s Answer to Modern Man , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 22 (1993): Essays
- Steven J Lenzner, Leo Strauss and His Contemporaries , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 22 (1993): Essays
- Robert Devigne, Plato, Nietzsche, & Strauss , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium
- Kent A Kirwan, The Poverty of Robert Paul Wolff , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Eugene F Miller, What Publius Says About Interest , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 19 (1990): Symposium: <em>The Federalist</em>
- Bruce Douglass, The Break in Voegelin’s Program , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 7 (1977): Reviews
- Charles E Butterworth, Frantz Fanon and Human Dignity , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- Gary J Schmitt, Sentimental Journey , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 12 (1982): Symposium: Political Parties and the Madisonian Model
- Robert Moffit, Robert Emmet Moffit, Constitutional Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 8 (1978): Reviews
- Don Roy, Roberto Unger’s Knowledge and Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 9 (1979): Reviews