Keywords
Prudence
Political Leadership
Virtue
How to Cite
Abstract
Despite the rich tradition of thought proclaiming the need for virtuous leaders, and the continued, widespread call for character in those who hold political office, both scholars and citizens remain puzzled concerning the precise relation of character to political leadership. Drawing on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, this article argues that prudence is the most important virtue for political leaders and that keystone for understanding all leading character. More specifically, Aristotle’s account of prudence in the Nicomachean Ethics enumerates the three “stages” of prudential action—deliberation, comprehension, and decision—that are the primary channels wherein the moral character of political leaders influences their conduct.
Similar Articles
- Abigail Staysa, Aristotle's Political Science and the Training in Pleasures and Pains , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Rachel Alexander Cambre, Women and the Virtue of Friendship in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Zachary K. German, The Visible Hands of Statesmanship , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Catherine Craig, Sara MacDonald, Wit’s Justice in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- John Boersma, Adam Smith’s Eulogy for Self-Command , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Christina Bambrick, The Promise of Virtue, Old and New , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- John Boersma, Leo Strauss on the Machiavellian Moment(s) in Aristotle , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Jacqueline Pfeffer Merrill, Voegelin on Aristotle’s “Science of the Polis” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Christie Maloyed, Hypocrisy and Democratic Leadership in Benjamin Franklin’s Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Max Smith, Machiavelli's Democratic Civil Religion in the Discourses on Livy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Harvey Flaumenhaft, Hamilton on The Foundation of Government , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 6 (1976): Reviews
- Paul Norton, The Three Elites of C. Wright Mills , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- William Allen, The Constitutionalism of The Federalist Papers , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 19 (1990): Symposium: <em>The Federalist</em>
- Gordon Lloyd, The Intellectual Socialism of John Kenneth Galbraith , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- Joel D Wolfe, Varieties of Participatory Democracy and Democratic Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 16 (1986): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Thomas Molnar, Is Technology Ideological? The Other Face of Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 18 (1988): Reviews
- Richard B Friedman, What Is a Non-Instrumental Law? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott
- David Schaefer, Shadia Drury’s Critique of Leo Strauss , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 23 (1994): Essays
- Edward J Erler, Public Policy and the “New Equality” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 8 (1978): Reviews
- Gregory Bruce Smith, Cacophony or Silence , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 18 (1988): Reviews