Keywords
wit
political theory
jest
How to Cite
Abstract
Francis Bacon (1561-1626) is best known as an advocate for human progress and the progenitor of the project that develops into what we understand as modern science. He is deeply concerned with the advancement of human learning and the ways in which knowledge is developed and shared. The success of his project, known as the Instauration, depends on both the serious application of inductive reasoning, and the skillful use of rhetoric to navigate the political world, including the judicious use of jests. Comedic in nature, jests prove to be valuable yet dangerous tools of persuasion. This article examines Bacon’s account of jest, its relationship to wit, and Bacon’s conclusion that while comedy is best understood as a philosophic vice, it may also be used as a political virtue.
Similar Articles
- Mathew Manweller, Controlling the “Commanding Heights” of Political Science Education , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 38 (2009): A Symposium on Rémi Brague’s <em>The Law of God: The Philosophical History of an Idea</em>
- J. David Franks, Apocalypse of Reality , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- James Read, John Adams and the Unpurchased Impact of Wealth , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Gordon Lloyd, Steven P Ealy, The Eric Voegelin-Willmoore Kendall Correspondence , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 33 (2004): Essays
- Zachariah Black, Jesting with Giants , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Lorraine Pangle, Plato's Political Epistemology , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Danielle Charette, Petrarch's Literary Empire , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Sara Henary, The “Best Fence” against Nature’s Ambiguity , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Daniel I. O’Neill, Reply to Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany