Keywords
humor
Matthew Arnold
democracy
comedy
culture
How to Cite
Abstract
English critic Matthew Arnold considered Mark Twain’s work symptomatic of a cultural thinness in America, where basic liberty, equality, and prosperity might be in reach of ordinary people, but where nothing would prod genuine cultural development. Twain might be able to entertain a “Philistine” middle class, Arnold implied, but ultimately he could not contribute anything “interesting” to human civilization. Twain responded vigorously to this criticism, developing a conception of “discriminating irreverence” that confirms the value of democracy while prodding citizens to see the limits of that regime. After comparing and evaluating Arnold’s and Twain’s arguments, I discuss how this nineteenth-century debate can inform our understanding of contemporary democratic humor.
Similar Articles
- Mark G Malvasi, Philosopher-Poet of the Rednecks , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Zachariah Black, Jesting with Giants , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- John Boersma, Adam Smith’s Eulogy for Self-Command , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger During the War , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Barry Cooper, Glenn Hughes, S.F. McGuire, Carol Cooper, Tilo Schabert, Author Meets Critics: Tilo Schabert's The Figure of Modernity: On the Irregularity of an Epoch , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Mark Blitz, How to Think about Politics and Culture , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 25 (1996): The State of Political Science: A Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Symposium
- Linus Recht, Thucydides at Melos , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- John von Heyking, “Had Every Athenian Citizen Been a Socrates” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Travis D. Smith, Thomas Hobbes, Comedian , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Emily B. Finley, Jefferson's Democratic Idealism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Alexander J Groth, Michael Parenti and American Democracy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- Richard Avramenko, Notes on Contributors , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Richard Avramenko, Notes on Contributors , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Walter Berns, Free Speech and Free Government , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 2 (1972): Reviews
- Samuel T Francis, Power and History , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 12 (1982): Symposium: Political Parties and the Madisonian Model
- Michael Promisel, Why Character Matters , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Jerry Weinberger, But Which Gods Will Save Us? The Political Legacy of Nietzsche and Heidegger , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 16 (1986): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Nicholas Capaldi, John Stuart Mill’s Defense of Liberal Culture , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium
- David DesRosiers, “The Team Against the Committee” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Ronald M Peters, Political Theory, Political Science, and A Preface to Democratic Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 7 (1977): Reviews