Keywords
Non-Domination
Mandragola
Sexual Assault
How to Cite
Abstract
In his writings about the historical figure of Lucretia, particularly in his play Mandragola, Machiavelli’s commitment to republican freedom as non-domination is complicated by the fact that Lucrezia’s consent to sex is coerced by the pressure of economic, social and religious sources. I suggest that in his politics generally, his emphasis on force and trickery reflects a similar ambiguity about the authentic nature of the freedom his republicanism achieves, particularly, the emphasis on non-domination in his thought recognized by Petit, Pocock, Skinner and Viroli. I argue that in his treatment of women generally, and of the woman Lucretia in the Discourses and the Mandragola particularly, Machiavelli most clearly displays the ambiguous status of domination in his thought, because for Machiavelli, women represent the transactions of the private realm, a realm particular susceptible to the threat of unfreedom.
Similar Articles
- Katherine Philippakis, Michael S. Kochin, Pimps, Cuckolds, and Philosophers , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- John Boersma, Leo Strauss on the Machiavellian Moment(s) in Aristotle , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Kirstin Anderson Birkhaug, Margaretta, Trojan Horse , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Ryan McKinnell, To Imitate the Ancients in the Hard Things or the Soft , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Max Smith, Machiavelli's Democratic Civil Religion in the Discourses on Livy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Glendon Schubert, Sexual Differences in Political Behavior , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 15 (1985): In Memoriam and Reviews
- Susan Shell, Kant’s Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Peter I Minowitz, Machiavellianism Come of Age? Leo Strauss on Modernity and Economics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 22 (1993): Essays
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Jonathan O'Neill, Traditionalist Conservatism and the Administrative State , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Michael Hanby, Before and After Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- John von Heyking, Steven F. McGuire, Glenn Hughes, Henrik Syse, Barry Cooper, Symposium: Barry Cooper’s Consciousness and Politics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- James Read, From Missouri Compromise to “House Divided” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Bradley Birzer, Leviathan, Inc , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Brandon Turner, O’Neill on Burke’s Not-Particularly- Conservative Logic of Empire , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Andrew Sabl, Nadia Urbinati, James Read, S. Adam Seagrave, Michelle Schwarze, Luke Mayville, Author Meets Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Timothy Fuller, Maurice Cowling, 1926–2005 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Emmanuel Patard, Supplement and Corrections to “The Strauss-Voegelin Correspondence” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 39 (2010): Symposia on American Constitutionalism and on Religion & Politics
- Timothy Fuller, Pfeffer Merrill, Avramenko, and Planinc on Eric Voegelin’s Use of Classical Political Science , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients