Keywords
Locke
theology
liberalism
Scripture
theology
liberalism
Scripture
How to Cite
Reason’s Handmaiden: John Locke’s Scriptural Interpretation in his Essay and Two Treatises. (2019). The Political Science Reviewer, 42(2), 327-356. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/547
Abstract
In Book IV of his Essay, John Locke offers his readers a method of scriptural interpretation. Using our reason, we are to judge pieces of Scripture as above, according to, or contrary to reason. This is not merely the imposition of arbitrary categories, but rather a process of reasoning. Using this method, I analyze four pieces of Scripture in the First Treatise. This analysis reveals that Scripture can be made reasonable and compatible with modern liberalism. Rather than discarding religion, Locke demonstrates how a liberal can engage with, and perhaps persuade, the illiberal believer.
Similar Articles
- C L Ten, Mill’s Place in Liberalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium
- Gregory M. Collins, Eric Voegelin on the Constitutional and Metaphysical Foundations of Property Rights in U.S. Supreme Court Jurisprudence , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Richard G Stevens, The Constitutional Completion of the Liberal Philosophy of Hobbes and Locke , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Robert Webking, Liberalism and the Environment , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- SJ James V. Schall, Metaphysics, Theology, and Political Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 11 (1981): Reviews
- Eugene F Miller, Locke on the Meaning of Political Language , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 9 (1979): Reviews
- Robert Horwitz, John Locke and The Preservation of Liberty , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 6 (1976): Reviews
- Rene Visme Williamson, The Political Impilications of the Theology of Karl Barth , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- Rene Visme Williamson, The Political Implications of the Theology of Paul Tillich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 3 (1973): Responses and Reviews
- Christian Bay, Hayek’s Liberalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 1 (1971): Reviews
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany