Keywords
Locke
theology
liberalism
Scripture
theology
liberalism
Scripture
How to Cite
Reason’s Handmaiden: John Locke’s Scriptural Interpretation in his Essay and Two Treatises. (2019). The Political Science Reviewer, 42(2), 327-356. https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/547
Abstract
In Book IV of his Essay, John Locke offers his readers a method of scriptural interpretation. Using our reason, we are to judge pieces of Scripture as above, according to, or contrary to reason. This is not merely the imposition of arbitrary categories, but rather a process of reasoning. Using this method, I analyze four pieces of Scripture in the First Treatise. This analysis reveals that Scripture can be made reasonable and compatible with modern liberalism. Rather than discarding religion, Locke demonstrates how a liberal can engage with, and perhaps persuade, the illiberal believer.
Similar Articles
- Scott Robinson, On the Use and Abuse of John Locke for Life , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Carol B. Cooper, Hans Urs von Balthasar and the Limits of Political Theology , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Joseph M Knippenberg, Liberalism and Religion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Daniel J. Mahoney, With Reason Attentive to Grace , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Verlan Lewis, Foundational Ideas in the Political Thought of F. A. Hayek , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 1 (2021): Symposium: Music in Plato's Political Thought
- Lee Ward, Brandon Turner, Michael Zuckert, Constantine Christos Vassiliou, Peter McNamara, Brianne Wolf, Author Meets Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Grant Havers, Does Politics Need a Theology? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- J. David Franks, Apocalypse of Reality , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Phillip Pinell, Thinking and Political Considerations , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Clemens Kauffmann, Men on Horseback , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- Laurin A Wollan, Crosskey’s Once and Future Constitution , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 5 (1975): Responses and Reviews
- Raoul Berger, A Political Scientist as Constitutional Lawyer , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- William Allen, Washington and Franklin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- John C Caiazza, Sociobiology and Human Nature , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 18 (1988): Reviews
- Angelo M Codevilla, On Comparing Governments , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 4 (1974): Responses and Reviews
- Allen D Nelson, Science and Values , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 10 (1980): Reviews
- Donald J Maletz, On the Revival of Hegelian Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 13 (1983): Reviews
- Wendell John Coats, Some Correspondence Between Oakeshott’s “Civil Condition” and the Republican Tradition , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 21 (1992): Symposium: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Thought of Michael Oakeshott
- Richard G Stevens, The Prospects for Constitutional Law , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium