Keywords
American constitutionalism
liberalism
Supreme Court
common law
How to Cite
Abstract
Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States advances American constitutionalism as a synthesis of two sources: common law principles and Lockean natural rights philosophy. Many have viewed this work as a supplemental education for lawyers and judges, but this interpretation disregards Story’s stated intent for the work. Instead, this paper takes seriously Story’s goal and evaluates the Commentaries as a project of civic education. Story presents a developmental account that centers on the American people, following their adoption of specific aspects of the common law, to their unity in opposition to Great Britain, and finally to their adoption of a government based on consent. By incorporating an American common law into the basis of American life, Story seeks to stabilize the republican order and provide a richer account of the rights articulated at the founding and the duties required for self-government.
Similar Articles
- Jacob T. Snyder, Work and Equality in American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Mark G Malvasi, Kirk among the Historians , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Sara Henary, The “Best Fence” against Nature’s Ambiguity , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 2 (2022): Jefferson, Paine, Tolstoy, Frankenstein, and more!
- Jeffrey Church, Elisabeth Ellis, Nicholas Tampio, Robert S. Taylor, Peter J. Steinberger, Michael Kryluk, Author Meets Critics: Jeffrey Church's Kant, Liberalism, and the Meaning of Life , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Robert A Heineman, Edmund Burke and the American Nation , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 35 (2006): Symposia on Edmund Burke and on Russell Kirk’s <em>The Conservative Mind</em>
- Barry Cooper, Hans Kelsen and Eric Voegelin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Luke C Sheahan, Robert Nisbet , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- James Read, John Adams and the Unpurchased Impact of Wealth , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Ted V McAllister, What Does Burke Have to Do With America? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Khalil M Habib, Islam and the Divine Law in The Law of God , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 38 (2009): A Symposium on Rémi Brague’s <em>The Law of God: The Philosophical History of an Idea</em>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany