Keywords
Theaetetus
Protagoras
epistemology
relativism
How to Cite
Abstract
This article explores how Socrates in the Theaetetus addresses the challenge of relativism and thereby grounds philosophy, arguing that the key to this project is his meticulous attention to the social, moral, and status-seeking phenomena that according to Socratic philosophy constitute our nature as political beings. The dialogue illustrates the human search for knowledge and illuminates the ways this search is often impeded by such passions as fear, pride, hope, acquisitiveness, and the desire for victory and honor. Where the Republic and Phaedo hold out hope that perfect knowledge may be found by escaping to a higher realm of pure ideas, the more sober Theaetetus shows that it is precisely the characteristics that make us political that make us able to know at all. The dialogue thus lays the groundwork for understanding, not knowledge as an incorruptible possession, but knowing as a thoroughly human activity.
Similar Articles
- John von Heyking, “Had Every Athenian Citizen Been a Socrates” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Michael Davis, Seth Benardete’s Second Sailing , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Raúl Rodríguez, Taming the Savage Beast , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Alexander Orwin, City, Poetry, and Song , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Jeremy Seth Geddert, Plato as Choirmaster , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 1 (2021): Symposium: Music in Plato's Political Thought
- Sophie Pangle, Plato on the Subversion of Law in Homeric Poetry , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 1 (2021): Symposium: Music in Plato's Political Thought
- Clemens Kauffmann, Men on Horseback , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century
- John von Heyking, S. F. McGuire, Barry Cooper, David J. Walsh, Thierry Gontier, John von Heyking's The Form of Politics: Aristotle and Plato on Friendship , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Jacqueline Pfeffer Merrill, Voegelin on Aristotle’s “Science of the Polis” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Timothy Fuller, Pfeffer Merrill, Avramenko, and Planinc on Eric Voegelin’s Use of Classical Political Science , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Edmund D Carlson, Martin Diamond as a Classroom Teacher , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 28 (1999): Martin Diamond’s Contribution to American Political Thought: A Symposium
- Dennis Hale, Welfare and Amenity in the Work of Bertrand de Jouvenel , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- John L Stanley, The Uncertainties of Politics and Texts , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 23 (1994): Essays
- Christopher Bruell, Strauss on Xenophon’s Socrates , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 13 (1983): Reviews
- Dante Germino, Leo Strauss versus Eric Voegelin on Faith , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium
- Adam Seagrave, The Promise of American Civic Friendship , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- James A Keim, Strauss and Watkins on Hobbes’s Political Philosophy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 13 (1983): Reviews
- Edward B McLean, A Christian Political Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 24 (1995): John Stuart Mill and Liberalism: A Symposium
- Christie Maloyed, Hypocrisy and Democratic Leadership in Benjamin Franklin’s Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- L. Peter Schultz, The Court, The Constitution, and Judicial Activism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 18 (1988): Reviews