Keywords
Republic
Justice
Eros
How to Cite
Abstract
This article provides a commentary on Plato’s Republic and focuses on the problems of justice and eros. The central contention of this study is that Plato presents apparent resolutions to these problems while alerting attentive readers of the irresolvable tension between justice and eros. Rather than simply resolve these interwoven problems, Plato repeats them; and, in so doing, he brings to light the nature of politics and philosophy. Although previous scholars have focused on how the Republic underscores these two themes, the broader significance of them remains obscure and unduly neglected. By focusing on the problems of justice and eros, this article revives and advances our understanding of key features of the Republic.
Similar Articles
- Timothy Fuller, Pfeffer Merrill, Avramenko, and Planinc on Eric Voegelin’s Use of Classical Political Science , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Matthew D. Mendham, A Flawed Moralist? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Dennis R Nolan, Sir William Blackstone and The New Republic , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 6 (1976): Reviews
- Lee Trepanier, Thinking in Times of Trouble , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Gordon Lloyd, Let Justice Be Our Guide , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Lynita K. Newswander, The Poetic Philosophy of Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 48 No. 1 (2024): Essays
- Linus Recht, Thucydides at Melos , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Richard G Stevens, Liberal Democracy and Justice in the Constitution of Walter Berns , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 22 (1993): Essays
- Mark G Malvasi, Philosopher-Poet of the Rednecks , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>
- Robert Devigne, Plato, Nietzsche, & Strauss , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 26 (1997): The Scholarship of George Anastaplo: A Symposium
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Quentin P Taylor, Publius and Persuasion , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 31 (2002): A Symposium on Gerhart Niemeyer
- Victor Bruno, Philosophy, Mysticism, and World Empires , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Paul Peterson, The Rhetorical Design and Theoretical Teaching of Federalist No. 10 , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 17 (1987): Symposium: The Constitutional Convention of 1787
- Richard Avramenko, The Gnostic and the Spoudaios , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Nathan Pinkoski, Why Alasdair MacIntyre is not a Conservative Post-Liberal , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- George Thomas, Liberal Tolerance and Mere Civility , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 2 (2018): Symposium: The Political Thought of Robert Nisbet
- Eduardo Schmidt Passos, Carl Schmitt’s Political Theory during the Third Reich , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, Leo Strauss on Nazism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany