Keywords
mixed regime
factions
education
prudence
leadership
statesmanship
How to Cite
Abstract
Cicero’s De Republica advocates a mixed regime dominated by the aristocracy, yet the dialogue emphasizes the danger that elites pose to a republic. This paradox has led some to argue that Cicero’s preference is simply ideological, while others emphasize the irrationality of the people. In this paper, I show that the aristocratic element is charged with providing the deliberation [consilium] necessary for republics to flourish and so must take precedence in a mixed regime. Although the De Republica does insist that the nature of politics often overcomes reason, I argue it emphasizes the irrational behavior of elites. Cicero proposes two ways of coping with the paradox: Politically, he defends popular checks on elite power, but he also attempts to shape the character of those who hold power by revealing to them the transience of earthly goods and pointing them toward a higher form of glory compatible with the common good.
Similar Articles
- Zachary K. German, The Visible Hands of Statesmanship , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Zachary K. German, What Prudence is Allowed to Produce , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Michael Promisel, Why Character Matters , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Daniel J. Mahoney, With Reason Attentive to Grace , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 46 No. 1 (2022): Symposium on Political Theology
- Adam Tate, Wrestling with the Modern State , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 2 (2017): Symposium: The Life and Work of Christopher Dawson
- Brent Edwin Cusher, Thucydides on Innovative Leadership and its Limits , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Abigail Staysa, Aristotle's Political Science and the Training in Pleasures and Pains , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Robert J. Burton, Animating the Public Spirit , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Mathew Manweller, Controlling the “Commanding Heights” of Political Science Education , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 38 (2009): A Symposium on Rémi Brague’s <em>The Law of God: The Philosophical History of an Idea</em>
- Christie Maloyed, Hypocrisy and Democratic Leadership in Benjamin Franklin’s Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kenneth B McIntyre, Conservative Practice versus Conservative “Values” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Frederick D Wilhelmsen, The Political Philosophy of Alvaro d’Ors , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 20 (1991): Reviews
- Ethan Alexander-Davey, Paul Gottfried, David Conway, Michael Harding, Yoram Hazony, Symposium on Yoram Hazony's The Virtue of Nationalism , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2019): Essays
- Eugene F Miller, David Easton’s Political Theory , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 1 (1971): Reviews
- Lee Trepanier, What Can Political Science Learn from Literature? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 1 (2020): Symposium: Wit in the History of Political Thought
- Bernat Torres Morales, Josep Monserrat Molas, The Significance of Plato’s Philebus in the Philosophy of Eric Voegelin , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 41 No. 1 (2017): Symposium: Eric Voegelin and the Ancients
- Leah Bradshaw, Hannah Arendt: The German Years , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Grant Havers, For the Love of the Bourgeois , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 40 (2016): A Symposium on Paul Gottfried’s Conservatism in America
- Mark Blitz, Heidegger During the War , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Judith Stewart Shank, Form and Restraint in John Crowe Ransom’s Vision of Community , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 30 (2001): Symposia on Kant Studies and on <em>I’ll Take My Stand</em>